Campbell v. Campbell

Decision Date12 March 1909
CitationCampbell v. Campbell, 29 R.I. 428, 71 A. 1058 (R.I. 1909)
PartiesCAMPBELL v. CAMPBELL et al.
CourtRhode Island Supreme Court

Action by Elisha J. Campbell against George E. Campbell and others.There was a verdict for defendants, and plaintiffpetitions for a new trial.Petition denied and dismissed.

See, also, 71 Atl. 309, 881.

Green, Hinckley & Allen, for petitioner.

James Harris and Irving Champlin, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.This is the appellant's petition for a new trial, under Court and Practice Act 1905, § 472, upon the ground that he did not have a full, fair, and impartial trial in the superior court, for the reason that the justice who presided at the trial in said superior court compelled his counsel to choose either to continue the case without witnesses after the regular hour of adjournment or to limit the number of witnesses to be called on the following day to those he could forthwith name, without having previously notified him that the court would sit beyond the usual time that night, or that he would be compelled to make such choice.

The conduct of the court complained of was subject to exception to be taken immediately, under Court and Practice Act 1905, § 483, which reads us follows: "Sec. 483.Exceptions to rulings, directions, and decisions made during a hearing in a cause heard by the court without a jury or during a trial by a jury shall be taken immediately. * * *" As was clearly explained by...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Campbell v. Campbell
    • United States
    • Rhode Island Supreme Court
    • July 6, 1909
    ...new trial after verdict for less than the relief demanded, he brings exceptions. Sustained. Case remitted for new trial. See, also, 29 R. I. 428, 71 Atl. 1058. Green, Hinckley & Allen, for James Harris and Irving Champlin, for appellees. JOHNSON, J. The plaintiff filed in the municipal cour......
  • Patriarca v. State
    • United States
    • Rhode Island Supreme Court
    • December 9, 1974
    ...said that mere error by the trial court which is correctable on appeal does not warrant a new trial on those grounds. Campbell v. Campbell, 29 R.I. 428, 71 A. 1058 (1909); Bristow v. Nichols, 19 R.I. 719, 37 A. 1033 (1897). In this case the Superior Court's denial of petitioner's motion for......
  • State v. Kemp
    • United States
    • Rhode Island Supreme Court
    • June 24, 1915
    ...298 of the General Laws for bringing cases here on bills of exception. Bristow v. Nichols, 19 R. I. 719, 37 Atl. 1033; Campbell v. Campbell, 29 R. I. 428, 71 Atl. 1058. See, also, Sarle v. Arnold, 7 R. I. 582, 587; Hamilton v. Hamilton, 10 R. I. 538, 542; Chapin v. Stone, 32 R. I. 311, 79 A......
  • Mclaughlin v. Dunlop., 8674.
    • United States
    • Rhode Island Supreme Court
    • December 6, 1944
    ...which ordinarily would form the subject of an exception, relief under this section of the statute is not warranted. Campbell v. Campbell, 29 R.I. 428, 71 A. 1058; Chapin v. Stone, 32 R.I. 311, 79 A. 787; State v. Kemp, 37 R.I. 572, 94 A. 429. But, even if we consider the petitioner's presen......
  • Get Started for Free