Campbell v. Faxon
Decision Date | 12 May 1906 |
Docket Number | 14,606 |
Citation | 85 P. 760,73 Kan. 675 |
Parties | JAMES A. CAMPBELL v. FRANK A. FAXON et al., as Partners, etc |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Decided January, 1906.
Error from Doniphan district court; WILLIAM I. STUART, judge.
STATEMENT.
ACTION by the firm of Faxon, Horton & Gallagher to recover for drugs purchased for the "Elk Pharmacy," in Kansas City. C. F. McCormick owned a drug-store and employed R. E Ela, jr., as his agent and manager of the store. A few months afterward McCormick died, and J. A. Campbell was appointed administrator of the estate. Campbell took possession of the drugstore, inventoried the stock, and agreed with Ela to continue the business upon the same plan as it had been conducted in McCormick's lifetime. The business was continued for about six months, during which time the goods in suit were purchased, but as it was not a success it was discontinued and the stock of drugs was sold to Mrs McCormick. The written agreement under which the store was managed by Ela prior to McCormick's death is as follows:
The goods purchased of plaintiffs under the Campbell regime were not paid for, and hence this action was brought and a recovery had against Campbell.
Judgment affirmed.
SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.
1. CONTRACTS--Master and Servant--Termination by Death. A contract that one party was to be the managing agent of a drug-store owned by another, which might be terminated at any time by either party, and in which it was agreed that instead of a salary the agent's compensation should depend upon the extent and success of the business, created a personal relation which was dissolved by the death of one of the parties, and was without binding effect upon the administrator of his estate.
2. ADMINISTRATORS--Conducting Decedent's Business without Authority--Liability. In the absence of a testamentary direction an administrator...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Pearce v. Pearce
... ... construed as to attain that result. Montgomery v ... Wilson, 189 Ala. 209, 66 So. 503; Campbell v ... Weakley, 121 Ala. 64, 25 So. 694. The policy of the ... statute favors such construction of a devise as will result ... in vesting the fee ... Willis v ... Sharp, 113 N.Y. 586, 21 N.E. 705, 4 L.R.A. 493; ... Lucht v. Behrens, 28 Ohio St. 231, 22 Am.Rep. 378; ... Campbell v. Faxon, 73 Kan. 675, 85 P. 760, 5 L.R.A ... (N.S.) 1002; Williams on Ex'rs (7th Ed.) 791; ... Schouler's Ex'rs and Adm'rs, § 325; 11 Am. & ... ...
-
Dolphin v. Peterson
... ... is justified in placing or leaving assets in trade. 18 Cyc ... p. 241; Campbell v. Faxon, 73 Kan. 675, 85 P. 760, 5 ... L.R.A.(N.S.) 1002 ... It is ... not the affair of the administrator to continue the ... ...
-
In re Delaney's Estate
... ... Thurmond, 27 Okl. 261, 111 P. 204, Ann. Cas. 1912B, 727; ... Mathews v. Sheehan, 76 Conn. 654, 57 A. 694, 100 Am ... St. Rep. 1017; Campbell v. Faxon, 73 Kan. 675, 85 P ... 760, 5 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1002; Kelley v. Kelley (C ... C.) 84 F. 420; Fleming v. Kelly, 18 Colo. App ... ...
-
Bowen v. Lewis, 44861
...to continue or operate the business. (2 Bartlett's Kansas Probate Law and Practice, rev. ed., § 824.) See, also, Campbell v. Faxon, 73 Kan. 675, 85 P. 760; 5 L.R.A.,N.S., We think the district court erred in not sustaining the appellant's motion for directed verdict. In the first place, a p......