Campbell v. Valley Garden Apartments
| Decision Date | 12 June 1992 |
| Parties | Viola CAMPBELL v. VALLEY GARDEN APARTMENTS and Oxford Properties, Inc., d/b/a Valley Garden Apartments. 1910549. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
William Dowsing Davis III of Davis & Goldberg, Birmingham, for appellant.
Y. Albert Moore III and Rennie S. Moody of Lanier Ford Shaver & Payne, P.C., Huntsville, for appellees.
The plaintiff, Viola Campbell, appeals from a summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Valley Garden Apartments and Oxford Properties, Inc., d/b/a Valley Garden Apartments.
The plaintiff, Viola Campbell, has lived in the Valley Garden Apartments since 1984. In 1986, she moved into the apartment where she now resides. There was at that time a sidewalk connected to Campbell's apartment that led to the garbage dumpster. Part of the sidewalk was a steel plate suspended over a drainage ditch.
The evidence before the trial court, viewed in a light most favorable to the plaintiff, indicates the following: In November or December 1988, Campbell told her son that the steel plate was slippery. Campbell's son complained to the resident manager of Valley Garden. At that time, Campbell's son was employed as a painter for the apartment complex. Campbell's son told the resident manager that the steel plate was slippery and that someone could easily slip and fall on it and thereby be injured. He claims that the resident manager agreed that the steel plate was "slick." Campbell's son also complained to the maintenance manager about the slippery condition of the steel plate.
On February 6, 1989, Campbell slipped on the steel plate and was injured. Campbell stated that it was raining and that the ground was frozen on the day she was injured. She claims that sometime after she was injured, the steel plates were painted. The owner of Valley Garden Apartments stated that the steel plates were painted with a compound that had a sandy substance in it, in order to give the steel plates a rough texture, but the owner said he was not sure if the steel plates had been painted prior to Campbell's injury.
An architect viewed the plates after the accident and stated that there was a coating on the steel plates that created a non-slip surface. The architect stated that in his opinion, based on the large amount of rust underneath the coating, the coating had been applied recently. He also stated that because the steel plate was suspended over the drainage ditch it would freeze over before the ground or the sidewalk would freeze over once the temperature was cold enough.
Campbell sued Valley Garden, alleging negligence and wantonness in maintaining the sidewalk. Valley Garden moved for a summary judgment, which the trial court entered. Campbell appeals.
Campbell argues that Valley Garden owed her a duty to safely maintain the sidewalk and that it breached this duty. Campbell contends that Valley Garden knew of the slippery condition of the steel plate connected to the sidewalk and failed to exercise reasonable care to make the sidewalk safe. Campbell also contends that Valley Garden knew that harm could come from having a slippery steel plate on a sidewalk. Valley Garden argues that Campbell knew of the allegedly dangerous condition of the sidewalk and was contributorily negligent, as a matter of law, in causing her injury.
A summary judgment is appropriate only when the moving party shows "that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law." Rule 56(c), A.R.Civ.P. Once the moving party has made a prima facie showing that there is no genuine issue of material fact, the nonmoving party must rebut that showing by presenting substantial evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact. § 12-21-12, Ala.Code 1975; Hope v. Brannan, 557 So.2d 1208 (Ala.1990). The evidence will be viewed in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party. King v. Winn-Dixie of Montgomery, Inc., 565 So.2d 12 (Ala.1990).
A landlord has the duty to maintain common areas in a reasonably safe condition in order to avoid liability for injury to...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Gentle v. Pine Valley Apartments
...common areas in a reasonably safe condition in order to avoid liability for injury to a tenant or a guest." Campbell v. Valley Garden Apartments, 600 So.2d 240, 241 (Ala.1992); see also Bates v. Peoples Savings Life Ins. Co. of Tuscaloosa, 475 So.2d 484 (Ala.1985); Coggin v. Starke Bros. Re......
-
Hale v. Sequoyah Caverns and Campgrounds, Inc.
...104 (Ala.1989), this Court has employed this analysis in Breeden v. Hardy Corp., 562 So.2d 159 (Ala.1990), and Campbell v. Valley Garden Apartments, 600 So.2d 240 (Ala.1992). The emerging trend among other jurisdictions is toward adoption of the "foreseeability" rule of § 343A. Kremer v. Ca......
-
Wallace v. The Hous. Auth. of the City of Talladega
...presents genuine issues of material fact which are created for the jury to resolve. Notably, our supreme court in Daniels overruled Turner, Campbell, and other cases quoting and/or applying the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 343A (Am. L. Inst. 1965). Specifically, our supreme court stated ......
-
Daniels v. Wiley
...walk in that."On September 17, 2019, Daniels responded to the motion for a summary judgment. She argued, citing Campbell v. Valley Garden Apartments, 600 So. 2d 240 (Ala. 1992), that, even though she had knowledge of the danger created by the accumulated mud on the sidewalk and curb, that k......