Campfield v. Cook

• Decision Date: 28 July 1892
• Court: Michigan Supreme Court
• Parties: CAMPFIELD et al. v. COOK.

52 N.W. 1031

92 Mich. 626

CAMPFIELD et al. v. COOK.

Supreme Court of Michigan

July 28, 1892

Certiorari to circuit court, Sanilac county; WATSON BEACH, Judge.

Action by William W. Campfield and Dennis Jones against Henry A. Cook. From a judgment setting aside an order dissolving an attachment, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Dickinson, Thurber & Stevenson and J. B. Houk, for appellant.

Avery Bros. & Walsh, (Farley & Aitken, of counsel,) for appellees.

GRANT, J.

The defendant made application under How. St. � 8026, for the dissolution of an attachment. The citation was served just three days before the return day thereof, one of which days was Sunday. The statute provides: "The citation shall be served three days at least before the return day thereof." How. St. � 8028. In Simonson v. Durfee, 50 Mich. 81, 14 N.W. 706, it was held that Sunday is not included in the two days in which a short summons from a justice's court may be made returnable. The statute in that case provided that the summons should be returnable not less than two days from its issue. It seems to be the settled rule that, where an act is required by statute to be done within any number of days less than a week, Sunday is to be excluded. Drake v. Andrews, 2 Mich. 204, and authorities there cited; Thayer v. Felt, 4 Pick. 354. In Harrison v. Sager, 27 Mich. 476, it was held that a justice of the peace could not render judgment on the fifth day after the trial, the fourth being Sunday, and the statute requiring judgment to be rendered within four days. That decision was based upon two reasons: (1) That it was competent for the justice to render judgment on either of the four days; and (2) that the statute was borrowed from New York, and it was reasonable to suppose that the legislature intended to adopt the construction given to it by the courts of that state. Judgment affirmed. The other justices concurred.