Campion v. Raritan Tp.
Decision Date | 22 December 1903 |
Citation | 56 A. 704 |
Parties | CAMPION v. RARITAN TP. et al. |
Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Certiorari by Annia Campion to review a tax sale by the township of Raritan. Tax sale set aside.
Argued November term, 1903, before FORT and PITNEY, JJ.
George S. Silzer, for prosecutor.
John W. Beekman, for defendants.
The tax sale brought up in this case was illegal, and must be set aside. Taxes are a lien in the townships of this state on December 20th next after their levy, and the lien continues for a period of two years, within which time there must be a sale if the townships desire to continue the lien. Harned v. City of Camden, 66 N. J. Law, 520, 49 Atl. 1082; Bradley v. Dike, 57 N. J. Law, 472, 32 Atl. 132; Johnson v. Van Horn, 45 N. J. Law, 136; Gen. St p. 3359, § 368. The proof shows that the sale for taxes on this case was not made within the two years. It also appears that the collector's return of the tax warrant was not made within the time required by the statute. The whole proceeding appears to' have been illegal, and hence the sale is void.
The tax sale brought up is set aside, with costs.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
McShain v. Evesham Tp.
...(The requirement that the lien of the tax has not expired appears to be no more than an historical remnant. See Campion v. Raritan Tp., 56 A. 704 (Sup.Ct.1903). Under our present system of taxation the lien of the tax does not Limited assistance in interpreting this clause is provided by tw......
- Davis v. Wilson