Camreta v. Greene, et al.; Alford v. Greene, et al.
| Docket Number | 09-1454,09-1478 |
| Decision Date | 26 May 2011 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
1236 cases
-
Berry v. Tex. Woman's Univ.
...statutory or constitutional right. Brown v. Coulston , 463 F. Supp. 3d 762, 774 (E.D. Tex. 2020) (quoting Camreta v. Greene , 563 U.S. 692, 705, 131 S.Ct. 2020, 179 L.Ed.2d 1118 (2011) ) (emphasis in original). The Court begins with the second prong of the qualified-immunity analysis and co......
-
Jiron v. Roth
...not binding authority and generally do not clearly establish the law for qualified immunity purposes. Camreta v. Greene , 563 U.S. 692, 709 n.7, 131 S.Ct. 2020, 179 L.Ed.2d 1118 (2011) (district courts do not make precedent, and many courts of appeals therefore decline to consider district ......
-
Garrett v. Clarke
...neither this Court's decision nor the Fourth Circuit's decision in Clowdis is binding precedent. Camreta v. Greene, 563 U.S. 692, 709 n.7, 131 S.Ct. 2020, 179 L.Ed.2d 1118 (2011) ("A decision of a federal district court judge is not binding precedent ... even upon the same judge in a differ......
-
Gray v. United States
...563 U.S. at 741, 131 S.Ct. 2074 ). District court decisions do not create clearly established law. See Camreta v. Greene , 563 U.S. 692, 709 n.7, 131 S.Ct. 2020, 179 L.Ed.2d 1118 (2011) ("A decision of a federal district court judge is not binding precedent in either a different judicial di......
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
Corporate Transparency Act Declared Unconstitutional By Alabama Federal Court ' What Does This Mean For Your Company?
...104 Va. L. Rev. 933 (2018) (exploring the history, practice, and implications of judicial review). 9 See, e.g., Camreta v. Greene, 563 U.S. 692, 709 n.7 (2011) ("A decision of a federal district court judge is not binding precedent in either a different judicial district, the same judicial ......
-
Websites and Coke Machines – Texas Judge says neither is covered by the ADA
...judicial district, the same judicial district, or even upon the same judge in a different case. Camreta v. Greene, 563 U.S. 692, 709 n.7, 131 S.Ct. 2020, 179 L.Ed.2d 1118 (2011), citing 18 J. Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 134.02[1] [d], p. 134–26 (3d ed.2011). ** See “Kiosks, Coc......
39 books & journal articles
-
ASSOCIATIONS AND CITIES AS (FORBIDDEN) PURE PRIVATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL.
...Inc., 137 S. Ct. 1645, 1650 (2017) (Alito, J.); Wittmanv. Personhuballah, 136 S. Ct. 1732, 1736 (2016) (Breyer, J.); Camreta v. Greene, 563 U.S. 692, 701 (2011) (Kagan, J.); DaimlerChrysler Corp. C. Cuno, 547 U.S. 332, 341-42 (2006) (Roberts, C.J.); Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Env......
-
THE REMAND POWER AND THE SUPREME COURT'S ROLE.
...enough to give the officer a stake in petitioning for certiorari, even though the judgment was in the officer's favor. Camreta v. Greene, 563 U.S. 692, 704-09 (39) See infra subsection III.C.1 (citing examples). (40) 135 S. Ct. 2001, 2013 (2015). (41) Id. (42) See id. (43) See infra subsect......
-
VOLUME II Chapter 24 Constitutional Rights of Public Employees
...2006) (rev'd on other grounds).[171] Lawson v. Union Cty. Clerk of Court, 828 F.3d 239, 249 (4th Cir. 2016).[172] Camreta v. Greene, 563 U.S. 692, 705 (2011); Crouse v. Town of Moncks Corner, 848 F.3d 576, 583-84 (4th Cir. 2017); Bland v. Roberts, 730 F.3d 368, 391 (4th Cir. 2013).[173] Id.......
-
Constitutional avoidance as interpretation and as remedy.
...requirement, due in part to criticism that it required courts to declare new constitutional doctrine in dicta). But see Camreta v. Greene, 131 S. Ct. 2020, 2030 (2011) (stating in dicta that an officer prevailing in a qualified immunity case can nonetheless appeal a finding that they violat......
Get Started for Free