Canard v. State, CR

Decision Date14 February 1983
Docket NumberNo. CR,CR
CitationCanard v. State, 646 S.W.2d 3, 278 Ark. 372 (Ark. 1983)
PartiesBobby CANARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee. 82-135.
CourtArkansas Supreme Court

Thaxton & Hout, Newport, for appellant.

Steve Clark, Atty. Gen., by Alice Ann Burns, Asst. Atty. Gen., Little Rock, for appellee.

ADKISSON, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Bobby Canard, was convicted by a jury of rape and was sentenced to forty years in the Arkansas Department of Correction. The only issue on appeal is whether there is sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction. We affirm.

Testimony at trial revealed that on December 12, 1980, appellant picked up his daughter at the home of his ex-wife and took her to Wal-Mart, where he purchased some boots for her. They ate supper at the Sonic Drive-In. Afterwards, while driving towards Grubbs, Arkansas, he turned off onto a gravel road and raped her. The daughter, who was eleven years old at the time, testified that her father stopped on the gravel road, telling her he had to let his headlights warm up. She stated that he then "unzipped my pants and took my leg out ... He unzipped his pants and took his penis out and put it into me and started raping me." She testified that she told him that she "didn't want to, but he did anyway."

Appellant contends that there is no showing of forcible compulsion and alleges that deviate sexual activity could have occurred rather than rape because the testimony is unclear as to exactly what body orifice of the daughter was penetrated. He also argues that there was no showing that appellant was the man who raped her. These contentions are without merit.

Forcible compulsion is defined in Ark.Stat.Ann. § 41-1801(2) (Repl.1977): " 'Forcible compulsion' means physical force, or a threat, express or implied, of death or physical injury to or kidnapping of any person." In Spencer v. State, 255 Ark. 258, 499 S.W.2d 856 (1973) we stated that the quantum of force need not be considered as long...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Flurry v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Court of Appeals
    • June 4, 1986
    ...having intercourse with me. She testified she did not kick or scream, that she was upset, crying, and told him no. In Canard v. State, 278 Ark. 372, 646 S.W.2d 3 (1983) the rape victim was the eleven-year-old daughter of the appellant. The witness testified that her father stopped the car o......
  • Barnum v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Court of Appeals
    • November 18, 2020
    ...demonstrated when sexual contact occurs after the victim told the defendant that she "didn't want to" have sex. Canard v. State , 278 Ark. 372, 374, 646 S.W.2d 3, 4 (1983).J.G. testified that she was awakened by Barnum's standing over her, telling her, "Give me some." She understood that to......
  • West v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Court of Appeals
    • March 1, 1989
    ...consummated against the will of the female. 255 Ark. at 261-62, 499 S.W.2d 856 (emphasis in Spencer ). More recently in Canard v. State, 278 Ark. 372, 646 S.W.2d 3 (1983), the court said: Forcible compulsion is defined in Ark.Stat.Ann. § 41-1801(2) (Repl.1977) [now codified as Ark. Code Ann......
  • Griswold v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • October 6, 1986
    ...else"? A: Every time he-- We have considered the quantum of proof necessary to prove forcible compulsion before. In Canard v. State, 278 Ark. 372, 646 S.W.2d 3 (1983), the appellant was convicted of raping his daughter, who was 11 at the time. Her testimony was that, " 'He unzipped his pant......
  • Get Started for Free