Cannon v. Florida Real Estate Commission, 2116
| Decision Date | 01 April 1969 |
| Docket Number | No. 2116,2116 |
| Citation | 221 So.2d 240 |
| Parties | John M. CANNON, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION and Charles A. Boyd, Jr., Respondents. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Benjamin T. Shuman of Waterhouse & Shuman, Orlando, for petitioner.
Robert L. Powe and Frank A. Wilkinson, Winter Park, for respondents.
The petitioner, John M. Cannon, seeks certiorari to review a final order of the Florida Real Estate Commission suspending his registration as a broker for alleged violation of F.S.1967, Section 475.25(1)(c), F.S.A. 1
The dispute precipitating the suspension arose when the petitioner refused and failed to pay a saleswoman in his employ her share of certain earned commissions. The petitioner claimed a setoff, counterclaim or forfeiture arising through the saleswoman's alleged misconduct.
Petitioner initially contests the authority of the commission to suspend under these facts. We agree.
Chapter 475, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., was enacted for the purpose of protecting the public in dealings with real estate agents. Ahern v. Florida Real Estate Commission ex rel. O'Kelley, 1942, 149 Fla. 706, 6 So.2d 857; Holland v. Florida Real Estate Commission, 1938, 130 Fla. 590, 178 So. 121; Shelton v. Florida Real Estate Commission, Fla.App.1960, 121 So.2d 711.
The role of the judiciary is usurped if the commission is permitted to decide charges which 'are predicated upon factual matters pertaining solely to the internal business affairs of a real estate agency'. Horne v. Florida Real Estate Commission, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 515, 517.
The administrative processes of the commission should be directed at the 'dishonest and unscrupulous operator, one who cheats, swindles or defrauds the General public in handling real estate transactions'. (Emphasis added.) Brod v. Jernigan, Fla.App.1966, 188 So.2d 575, 576.
Although no Florida decision decides whether a real estate sales person is a 'person' within the meaning of F.S.1967, Section 475.25(1)(c), F.S.A., other jurisdictions with similar statutes have considered the question and generally agree that a sales person, employed by a broker, is not within the class of persons protected. 2 This is compatible with our view herein.
The relationship between a real estate broker and his sales personnel is contractual in nature. Enforcement of rights thereunder, absent fraud, concealment or dishonest acts, 3 should be by a court of proper jurisdiction rather than by an administrative agency.
The instant case involves an internal dispute between broker and saleswoman over payment of an earned commission. The commission did not find any dishonest conduct by the broker. We conclude the statute sub judice, 4 under such circumstances, does not contemplate a saleswoman to be a 'person' within its meaning for invocation of actionable authority by the commission.
For the foregoing reasons certiorari is granted and the Florida Real Estate Commission's final order is quashed with instructions to enter a dismissal of the stated charges against petitioner. 5
1 F.S. 475.25, F.S.A. 'Grounds for revocation or suspension.--
'(1) The registration of a registrant may be suspended for a period not exceeding two years, or until compliance with a lawful order imposed in the final order of suspension, or both, upon a finding of facts showing that the registrant has:
'* * *
'(c) Failed to account or deliver To any person any personal property such as money, fund, deposit, check, draft, abstract of title, mortgage, conveyance, lease, or other document, or thing of value, or any secret or illegal profit, or any divisible share or portion thereof, which has come into his hands, and which is not his property, or which he is not in law or equity entitled to retain, under the circumstancs, and at the time which has been agreed upon, or is required by law, or, in the absence of a fixed time, upon demand of the person entitled to such accounting and delivery; provided, however, that, if the registrant shall, in good faith, entertain doubt as to his duty to account and deliver said property, or as to what person is entitled to the accounting and delivery, or if conflicting demands therefor shall have been made upon him, and he has not appropriated the property to his own use, or intermingled it with his own property of like kind, he may notify the commission promptly, truthfully stating the facts, and ask its advice thereon, or after notice thereof to...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Middelsteadt v. Karpe
...P.2d 104; Houston v. Williams (1921) 53 Cal.App. 267, 271, 200 P. 55; 10 Cal.Jur.3d, § 8, p. 484; see also: Cannon v. Florida Real Estate Commission (Fla.App.1969) 221 So.2d 240, 241; Phoenix Assurance Company of New York v. Young (1961), 104 Ga.App. 55, 121 S.E.2d 70, 71; Eberman v. Massac......
-
Fleischman v. Department of Professional Regulation
...not be enforced by disciplinary action undertaken by a regulatory agency like the real estate commission. Cannon v. Florida Real Estate Commission, 221 So.2d 240 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969), cert. denied, 226 So.2d 817 (Fla.1969); Peck Plaza Condominium v. Division of Florida Land Sales and Condomi......
-
Nechtman v. Saker
...as it existed on the date of the alleged misconduct. In support of this contention petitioner cites the case of Cannon v. Florida Real Estate Comm., Fla.App.1969, 221 So.2d 240, cert. denied, Fla., 226 So.2d 817. We are of the opinion that the facts of the case sub judice fall squarely in l......
-
Golub v. Department of Professional Regulation, 83-65
...hands (usually as escrowed funds) and which the licensee did not own or have the legal right to retain. Cannon v. Florida Real Estate Commission, 221 So.2d 240 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969), cert. den., 226 So.2d 817 (Fla.1969), held that the statute did not apply where, as here, a broker withholds c......