Canterberry v. Miller

Decision Date31 January 1875
Citation1875 WL 8209,76 Ill. 355
PartiesOLIVER P. CANTERBERRYv.CHARLES MILLER.
CourtIllinois Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Sangamon county; the Hon. CHARLES S. ZANE, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. CULLOM, SCHOLES & MATHER, for the appellant.

Messrs. MATHENY & MCGUIRE, for the appellee.

Mr. JUSTICE CRAIG delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was an action of assumpsit, brought by appellant, in the circuit court of Sangamon county, against appellee, to recover for a breach of a contract, in and by which it is claimed by appellant he sold appellee 100 head of hogs for a certain price, and to be delivered at a certain time and place, which appellee failed and refused to accept and pay for according to the terms of the contract.

In support of the contract sued upon, appellant testified that, on the 30th day of April, 1873, he and appellee made a contract in writing in regard to the sale of the hogs, and that he signed and delivered to appellee the following writing:

“I have this day bought of O. P. Canterberry 100 head of hogs, to average 225 lbs. and over, to be delivered at Sherman between the 1st and 20th of July, at my option. The hogs to be weighed on his scales, and delivered at his expense. All the above hogs to be well fatted, no sows to show pigs, no stags or boars. For which I agree to pay $4.50 per hundred lbs. on delivery.

This 30th day of April, 1873.

O. P. CANTERBERRY.”

And that, at the same time, appellee signed and delivered to him a writing, as follows:

I have this day sold to Charles Miller 100 head of hogs, to average 225 lbs. and over. The hogs to be weighed at my scales, and delivered at Sherman at my expense, between the 1st and 20th of July, at his option. All the above hogs to be well fatted, no sows to show pigs, no stags or boars. For which he agrees to pay $4.50 per hundred lbs. on delivery.

This 30th day of April, 1873.

CHARLES MILLER.”

These writings were offered in evidence by appellant, but were excluded by the court, and no other evidence having been introduced by appellant in support of the contract declared upon in the declaration, the jury returned a verdict in favor of appellee, upon which the court rendered judgment.

The only question presented by the record is, whether these writings constitute a valid contract between the parties. The two instruments having been made at the same time, and relating to the same subject matter, may be regarded as a single instrument, and construed together.

But when viewed in this manner, do they constitute a contract that can be enforced in a court of law?

A contract is defined to be an agreement of two or more persons upon a sufficient consideration to do or not to do a particular thing. 2 Kent, 450.

But these papers, offered in evidence as a contract, do not appear to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • People ex rel. Deneen v. Economy Light & Power Co.
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • 26. Oktober 1909
    ...should be construed together in determining the real intention of the parties. This rule has often been applied by this court. Canterberry v. Miller, 76 Ill. 355;Wilson v. Roots, 119 Ill. 379, 10 N. E. 204;Gardt v. Brown, 113 Ill. 475, 55 Am. Rep. 434. Applying this rule to the flowage cont......
  • Brown v. Reasner
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • 31. Oktober 1879
    ... ... Findley, 11 Gratt. 434; Ellmaker v. Ellmaker, 4 Watts, 89; Canterbury v. Miller, 76 Ill. 355; Benjamin v. McConnell, 4 Gilm. 536.If the contracting party uses language of doubtful meaning he cannot complain if a construction ... ...
  • Schermerhorn v. Cassem
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • 31. Mai 1881
    ...v. Howser, 63 Ill. 312. An unambiguous contract must be enforced according to its legal effect: Walker v. Tucker, 70 Ill. 527; Canterberry v. Miller, 76 Ill. 355. As to estoppel: Hunter v. Bryden, 21 Ill. 592; Steward v. Metcalf, 68 Ill. 109; Ill. Ins. Co. v. Littlefield, 67 Ill. 368; Herma......
  • Stephani v. the Catholic Bishop of Chicago.
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • 31. Oktober 1878
    ...5 Gilm. 536; Smith v. Brown, 5 Gilm. 309; Crabtree v. Hagenbaugh, 25 Ill. 233; Walker et al. v. Tucker et al. 70 Ill. 527; Canterbury v. Miller, 76 Ill. 355; Corbett v. Underwood, 83 Ill. 324; Mann v. Swyser et al. 76 Ill. 365; Hypes v. Griffin, 11 Chicago Legal News, 33; Marc v. Kupfer, 34......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT