Cape Canaveral Hosp., Inc. v. Nickell, 95-856

CourtCourt of Appeal of Florida (US)
Writing for the CourtKAHN
Citation668 So.2d 219
Parties21 Fla. L. Weekly D320 CAPE CANAVERAL HOSPITAL, INC. and Sedgwick, Inc., Appellants, v. Sandra NICKELL, Appellee.
Docket NumberNo. 95-856,95-856
Decision Date30 January 1996

Page 219

668 So.2d 219
21 Fla. L. Weekly D320
CAPE CANAVERAL HOSPITAL, INC. and Sedgwick, Inc., Appellants,
v.
Sandra NICKELL, Appellee.
No. 95-856.
District Court of Appeal of Florida,
First District.
Jan. 30, 1996.
Rehearing Denied March 7, 1996.

Page 220

An Appeal from an Order of Judge of Compensation Claims; J. Paul Jones, Jr.

Herbert A. Langston, Jr. and Julia M. Pinnell of Langston, Hess & Bolton, P.A., Maitland, for appellants.

Gray M. Camfield of Alpizar & Gray, P.A., Palm Bay; and Bill McCabe of Shepherd, McCabe & Cooley, Longwood, for appellee.

KAHN, Judge.

In this workers' compensation appeal, the issues raised by appellant concerning whether appellee suffered an injury by accident and whether the judge of compensation claims (JCC) properly awarded periods of temporary total disability benefits and temporary partial disability benefits are factual matters. The JCC sits as the finder of fact where the testimony is conflicting, and this court will not reweigh the evidence so long as the JCC's findings are supported by competent substantial evidence. Accordingly, we have no alternative but to affirm the judge's finding of an injury and the award of benefits. The JCC's refusal to apply an offset for certain disability insurance benefits paid to appellee, however, presents a legal error that we are empowered to correct.

Appellee Sandra Nickell injured herself at work on July 22, 1993, one day before her resignation was to take effect. As an employee benefit, she had a disability insurance policy with Paul Revere Life Insurance Company (Paul Revere). The employer paid premiums to Paul Revere until May of 1993, one month before appellee's resignation. This premium covered the period until the next premium payment was due in November 1993. Although Nickell was able to keep the disability policy, she had no further obligation to pay premiums. The policy provided for a waiver of premium when a disability had continued for 90 days. The first 90 days of disability are excluded from coverage by the terms of the policy. Paul Revere eventually began paying disability benefits under its policy and established a commencement date retroactive to October 20, 1993, 90 days after the injury. Nickell testified she mailed in the premium for November 1993; however, the insurance company returned the payment because of the waiver of premium provision. Under these facts, we conclude that the term of Nickell's disability under the insurance policy...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 practice notes
  • Wilcox v. Ag Mart Produce, 1D06-1280.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • November 28, 2006
    ...he was injured. It is not the proper role of this court to reweigh the evidence presented below. Cape Canaveral Hosp., Inc. v. Nickell, 668 So.2d 219, 220 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) ("The JCC sits as the finder of fact where the testimony is conflicting, and this court will not reweigh the evidenc......
  • Leon County School Bd. v. Green, No. 97-1161
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • April 15, 1998
    ...the evidence so long as the JCC's findings are supported by competent substantial evidence." Cape Canaveral Hosp., Inc. v. Nickell, 668 So.2d 219, 220 (Fla. 1st DCA Although Dr. Miller's testimony was to some extent confusing and even internally conflicting, I believe that his testimony doe......
  • Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Thompson, No. 1D07-2661.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • February 6, 2008
    ...DCA 2006) ("It is not the proper role of this court to reweigh the evidence presented below."); Cape Canaveral Hosp., Inc. v. Nickell, 668 So.2d 219, 220 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) ("The JCC sits as the finder of fact where the testimony is conflicting, and this court will not reweigh the evidence......
3 cases
  • Wilcox v. Ag Mart Produce, 1D06-1280.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • November 28, 2006
    ...he was injured. It is not the proper role of this court to reweigh the evidence presented below. Cape Canaveral Hosp., Inc. v. Nickell, 668 So.2d 219, 220 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) ("The JCC sits as the finder of fact where the testimony is conflicting, and this court will not reweigh the evidenc......
  • Leon County School Bd. v. Green, No. 97-1161
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • April 15, 1998
    ...the evidence so long as the JCC's findings are supported by competent substantial evidence." Cape Canaveral Hosp., Inc. v. Nickell, 668 So.2d 219, 220 (Fla. 1st DCA Although Dr. Miller's testimony was to some extent confusing and even internally conflicting, I believe that his testimony doe......
  • Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Thompson, No. 1D07-2661.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • February 6, 2008
    ...DCA 2006) ("It is not the proper role of this court to reweigh the evidence presented below."); Cape Canaveral Hosp., Inc. v. Nickell, 668 So.2d 219, 220 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) ("The JCC sits as the finder of fact where the testimony is conflicting, and this court will not reweigh the evidence......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT