Cape Romain v. Wando E., LLC

Docket Number27298
Decision Date14 August 2013

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
15 cases
  • Dean v. Heritage Healthcare of Ridgeway, LLC
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • June 18, 2014
    ...(Citing Timms v. Greene, 310 S.C. 469, 427 S.E.2d 642 (1993), overruled in part by Cape Romain Contractors, Inc. v. Wando E., L.L.C., 405 S.C. 115, 123 n. 5, 747 S.E.2d 461, 465 n. 5 (2013)). We disagree. “[T]he basic purpose of the [FAA] is to overcome courts' refusals to enforce agreement......
  • Smith v. D.R. Horton, Inc.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • July 6, 2016
    ...“ ‘Generally, any arbitration agreement affecting interstate commerce is subject to the FAA.’ ” Cape Romain Contractors, Inc. v. Wando E., LLC , 405 S.C. 115, 121–22, 747 S.E.2d 461, 464 (2013) (quoting Landers v. Federal Deposit Ins. Co rp ., 402 S.C. 100, 108, 739 S.E.2d 209, 213 (2013) )......
  • Doe v. TCSC, LLC
    • United States
    • South Carolina Court of Appeals
    • July 1, 2020
    ...Carolina and federal policy favoring arbitration, arbitration agreements are presumed valid. See Cape Romain Contractors, Inc. v. Wando E., LLC , 405 S.C. 115, 125, 747 S.E.2d 461, 466 (2013). We review circuit court determinations of arbitrability de novo , but will not reverse a circuit c......
  • Masters v. KOL, Inc.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Court of Appeals
    • July 22, 2020
    ...instrumentalities of interstate commerce, which are subject to regulation by Congress) (cited in Cape Romain Contractors, Inc. v. Wando E., LLC , 405 S.C. 115, 122, 747 S.E.2d 461, 464 (2013) ); Landers v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. , 402 S.C. 100, 108, 739 S.E.2d 209, 213 (2013) ("Generally, ......
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • Chapter XI Alternative Dispute Resolution
    • United States
    • SC Construction Law Desk Book (SCBar)
    • Invalid date
    ...Inc. v. Bd. of Trs. of Leland Stanford Jr. Univ., 489 U.S. 468 (1989).[101] Cape Romain Contractors, Inc. v. Wando E., LLC, et al., 405 S.C. 115, 747 S.E.2d 461 (2013).[102] Id. citing United States v. Gould, 568 F.3d 459, 470 (4th Cir. 2009) (quoting United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598......
  • Are Standardform Arbitration Agreements Enforceable in South Carolina?
    • United States
    • South Carolina Bar South Carolina Lawyer No. 35-1, July 2023
    • January 1, 2023
    ...Carolinas, LLC, 437 S.C. 596, 879 S.E.2d 746 (2022), reh'g denied, Nov. 17, 2022. [2] Cape Romain Contractors, Inc. v. Wando E., LLC, 405 S.C. 115, 126-27, 747 S.E.2d 461, 467 (2013) (quoting Zabinski v. Bright Acres Assocs., 346 S.C. 580, 597, 553 S.E.2d 110, 118 (2001)). [3] Landers v. Fe......
  • E. Federal Arbitration Act
    • United States
    • SC Construction Law Desk Book Supplement (SCBar) Chapter XI Alternative Dispute Resolution
    • Invalid date
    ...mechanic's lien was deemed arbitrable based upon the contract language.91.3 91.1 Cape Romain Contractors, Inc. v. Wando E., LLC, et al., 405 S.C. 115, 747 S.E.2d 461. 91.2 Id. citing United States v. Gould, 568 F.3d 459, 470 (4th Cir. 2009) (quoting United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598, ......