Capers v. State, CR-92-0430

Citation646 So.2d 688
Decision Date13 August 1993
Docket NumberCR-92-0430
PartiesCurtis Matthew CAPERS v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Court of Criminal Appeals

Appeal from Escambia Circuit Court; Bradley Byrne, Judge.

Curtis Matthew Capers, pro se.

James H. Evans, Atty. Gen., and Andrew Redd, Dept. of Corrections, for appellee.

MONTIEL, Judge.

Curtis Matthew Capers filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus with the Escambia Circuit Court, alleging that he has not been credited with jail time for the time he spent at liberty or on erroneous release. The State, in its brief, acknowledges that the appellant's allegation has merit. This court in McCall v. State, 594 So.2d 733 (Ala.Crim.App.1992), held that a defendant is entitled to habeas corpus relief if the court determines "that he was erroneously released, that his release occurred through no fault of his own, and that he had not been given credit for the time he spent at liberty on that erroneous release." 594 So.2d at 734. Therefore, this cause is remanded to the circuit court with instructions that a hearing be held to determine whether the factual allegations made by the appellant are true. If the allegations are found to be true, the appellant is entitled to habeas corpus relief.

The circuit court is ordered to file written findings of fact with this court within 60 days of this opinion.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Breach v. State, CR-95-1354
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • August 23, 1996
    ...time credit. See Henry v. State, 666 So.2d 546 (Ala.Cr.App.1994); Swicegood v. State, 646 So.2d 158 (Ala.Cr.App.1993); Capers v. State, 646 So.2d 688 (Ala.Cr.App.1993). But see Swicegood v. State, 646 So.2d 159 In its response and motion to dismiss the appellant's petition, the state merely......
  • McCorvey v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • October 20, 1995
    ...was entitled to a hearing on the merits to ascertain facts sufficient to apply the principle enunciated in Agee. See Capers v. State, 646 So.2d 688 (Ala.Cr.App.1993); McCall; Giles. Accordingly, this cause is remanded to the circuit court with the instructions that a hearing be held to dete......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT