Capital Fire Insurance Company v. Kaufman
Decision Date | 12 July 1909 |
Citation | 121 S.W. 289,91 Ark. 310 |
Parties | CAPITAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. KAUFMAN |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
[Copyrighted Material Omitted]
Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court, First Division; Robert J. Lea Judge; affirmed.
STATEMENT BY THE COURT.
Appellee sued appellant on a policy of fire insurance issued February 15, 1907, insuring for a lump sum of $ 52 a stock of merchandise and household goods. The insurance on the stock of goods was $ 1,000, and on the household effects $ 500. It was alleged that the fire and total loss of the property insured occurred during the life of the policy. The complaint asked judgment for the full amount of the policy, with 6 per cent. interest and penalty and attorney's fees.
The answer set up in defense the application, which was made a part of the contract, and the following stipulations in the policy, to-wit:
It was alleged "that the plaintiff did not preserve the inventory referred to in his application, nor books and invoices referred to therein, in an iron safe at night and at all times when not open for business; and that the same were destroyed in violation not only of the terms and agreements in his said application, but in violation of the terms and agreements in the policy as quoted; whereby the conditions of said policy contract were violated, and the defendant was released from liability."
Appellee was a merchant at Wampoo. She and her husband, who was her business manager (and whom we shall hereafter in the statement designate as the appellee for convenience), lived over the store room. The fire occurred February 8, 1908 first in an adjoining building. It then destroyed the building occupied by appellee and its contents. The stock of goods at the time of the fire was valued at $ 7,000, and the household effects were valued at $ 1,100 or $ 1,200. Appellee's counsel further states the facts correctly as follows: "Every Saturday night appellee posted his books. The store house was cold and uncomfortable, and a stairway led from the store up to the living rooms of appellee. After the active business of the day was over, he turned out the loafers, locked his doors, left his lights burning in the store, and took his books up the short flight of stairs into his bedroom, where he had a good light and warm fire, and a comfortable place in which to work. He generally closed about 10 o'clock, but was in the habit of coming down to wait on customers until he finally put out his lights, and, in case of an urgent call for medicines or necessaries, would come down later. At the time of the fire he had not extinguished the lights in the store, and had not replaced his books and cash in the iron safe. This was the custom of appellee, and also the custom of the only other store at Wampoo. The owner of the other store closed about ten or eleven o'clock, according to the weather, on Saturday nights, and then left for his home, about a mile or a mile and a half away from his store. The population around Wampoo is pretty nearly all negroes. They get paid off on Saturday, and generally sit around appellee's store, talking, eating peanuts and chewing tobacco until appellee told them he wanted to close up. After appellee finished writing up his books, he would take his cash and his books downstairs into the store, and put them in the iron safe, lock up the safe and extinguish the lights for the night.
The policy of insurance was taken out February 15, 1907. Appellee took an inventory January, 1907, and August, 1907, between the 1st and 5th of the month. These inventories were copied into a large book, in which were kept the accounts of the store and other data of the business. This book was upstairs, and was burned. There were other books in the iron safe at the time, bringing the business down to 1906, and a credit book bringing the business down to the date of the fire. These books appellee had no occasion to have upstairs. There was also a credit ledger in the safe which was saved. Appellee had been at work on the books about an hour before the fire broke out. It was his habit to put the books in the iron safe at night, except on Saturday night, when he took them to his room to post them, leaving the light burning in the store until he finished posting his books. He testified that he intended carrying them down stairs and putting them in the big combination lock iron safe after he had finished work on them. He would then put out the lights in the store. The lights were still burning in the store at the time the fire broke out. The store was 40 feet by 22 feet, and the stairs ran straight up from the inside of the store in the rear of the bedroom.
Wampoo is six miles from the railroad. The postoffice is in appellee's store, and he is the postmaster. The invoices had been entered in the book that was destroyed by fire, and the invoices themselves were wrapped up and put away in pigeon-holes in the store. When the invoices came in, appellee put them in the safe until Saturday night, when he took them with his book up to his room to copy them. He did not copy the items in detail, but only entered on his book the footings or aggregate amount shown by each invoice.
The court, over the objection of appellant, gave the following instructions:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hooten v. State Use Cross County
...and if they lost nothing by reason of this failure, there is no liability on the bank. 96 Ark. 379; 7 Ark. 171; 79 Ark. 160; Id. 266; 91 Ark. 310; Ark. 26; 12 Ark. 296; 71 Ark. 305; 74 Ark. 68; 43 Ark. 454; 53 Ark. 275. Allen Hughes, for appellants Hooten and Going. 1. Appellants are not li......
-
Thomas Cox & Sons Machinery Co. v. Forshee
...Ark. 43. This court will not reverse for harmless error. The jury disregarded the claims of appellees for damages. 89 Ark. 261; 88 Ark. 7; 91 Ark. 310; 85 Ark. 452; 83 Ark. 2. Instruction 4, requested by appellant, was properly refused. It is ambiguous, assumes the existence of facts and is......
-
Penix v. American Cent. Ins. Co.
...... J. H. Penix against the American Central Insurance Company. From a judgment for defendant plaintiff appeals. ... stock of goods destroyed by fire. The defense of the. insurance company was that the ...v. Jones, 15 S.W. 1034; Capitol F. Ins. Co. v. Kaufman, 91 Ark. 310, 121 S.W. 289;. Phoenix Ins. Co. v. ......
-
Wright v. Midland Valley Railroad Co.
......196 WRIGHT v. MIDLAND VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY" Supreme Court of ArkansasJanuary 26, 1914 . \xC2"... were correct. Capitol Fire Ins. Co. v. Kaufman, [111 Ark. 203] 91 Ark. 310, 121 S.W. ......