Capitol Refrigerator Co., Inc. v. Schmidt, 60.
| Decision Date | 13 January 1939 |
| Docket Number | No. 60.,60. |
| Citation | 121 N.J.L. 581,3 A.2d 603 |
| Parties | CAPITOL REFRIGERATOR COMPANY, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edward SCHMIDT, Defendant-Respondent. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Appeal from Supreme Court.
Charles J. Falcey, of Trenton, for appellant.
George McElroy, of Trenton, and Sam Weiss, of Newark, for respondent.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed for the reasons expressed in an opinion of the Supreme Court reported in 120 N.J.L. 433, 200 A. 552.
For affirmance: The CHANCELLOR, The CHIEF JUSTICE, Justices CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, and PORTER, and Judges HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, and WALKER—13.
For reversal: None.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
W. H. Bintz Co. v. Mueggler
...of recoupment in diminution or extinction of the price." (I. C. A., 62-507 (1) (a); Capitol Refrigerator Co. v. Schmidt, 200 A. 552 aff. in 3 A.2d 603; Peuser v. Marsh, N.E. 494 (N. Y.) Ann. Cas. 1918B at p. 913. The provision in the contract requiring respondent to give the appellant notic......
-
Marendino v. Spitz, 13.
... ... New Jersey Zinc & Iron Co. v. Lehigh Zinc Co., 59 N.J.L. 189, 192, 35 A. 915; Camden ... ...