Capo by Joseph v. City of New York
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
| Writing for the Court | Before MILONAS |
| Citation | Capo by Joseph v. City of New York, 564 N.Y.S.2d 84, 166 A.D.2d 201 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990) |
| Decision Date | 04 October 1990 |
| Parties | Andre CAPO, an Infant, by His Parent and Natural Guardian, Patricia JOSEPH, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant, New York City Housing Authority, Defendant-Appellant. |
Before MILONAS, J.P., and ROSENBERGER, ASCH, KASSAL and RUBIN, JJ.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard R. Silver, J.), entered February 28, 1989, which granted plaintiffs' motion for leave to file an amended notice of claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements.
The infant plaintiff was allegedly bitten by a pit bull on July 9, 1988 at a New York City Housing Authority project in the Bronx. A timely notice of claim was filed, stating the location of the incident to be 1774 Macombs Road. The Housing Authority responded by letter of October 18, 1988, stating that it did not own, operate, or control the stated premises. Less than four weeks later, at the statutory hearing, the Housing Authority was provided with the police report indicating the premises as 1647 Macombs Road. There is no indication that the Housing Authority undertook any investigation based upon this new information. On December 7, 1988, plaintiffs brought this motion for leave to amend the notice...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Carr v. City of New York
...granted where the error was made in good faith and there is an absence of prejudice to the municipality (see, e.g., Capo v. City of New York, 166 A.D.2d 201, 564 N.Y.S.2d 84; Burke v. Incorporated Vil. of Hempstead, 156 A.D.2d 630, 549 N.Y.S.2d 128; Tucker v. Long Is. R.R. Co., 128 A.D.2d 5......
-
Alvarez v. New York City Housing Authority
...of the location was corrected by the hearing, without prejudice to defendant (General Municipal Law § 50-e[6]; Capo v. City of New York, 166 A.D.2d 201, 564 N.Y.S.2d 84). Nor is there any merit to defendant's argument that plaintiff was attempting to change the theory of ...