Capocy's Estate, In re

Decision Date14 December 1981
Docket NumberNo. 80-2890,80-2890
Citation430 N.E.2d 1131,102 Ill.App.3d 609
Parties, 58 Ill.Dec. 880 In re the ESTATE OF Charles CAPOCY, Deceased. Appeal of Heirs of Josephine PIPER, Deceased.
CourtUnited States Appellate Court of Illinois

Paul V. Kaulas, Chicago (Rory Cassidy, Chicago, of counsel), for appellant Heirs of Josephine Piper, deceased.

Jaros, Tittle & O'Toole, Chicago (Thomas A. Rosiello and Joseph J. Jaros, Jr., Chicago, of counsel), for appellant Talman Home Federal Savings and Loan Association of Illinois.

Daniel A. Riley, Riley, Riley & Riley, Hickory Hills, for appellee Sam Izzi, Independent Administrator of the Estate of Charles Capocy, deceased.

GOLDBERG, Justice:

This appeal involves disposition of the assets of a savings account trust executed by Charles Capocy (settlor) for the benefit of his niece, Josephine Piper, and deposited at Talman Federal Savings and Loan Association of Illinois (Talman). Upon motion of the independent administrator of the settlor's estate, the trial court directed Talman to release the proceeds of the account to the administrator for distribution to the Capocy heirs. Talman and the heirs of Josephine Piper appeal.

The savings account in question was opened on October 5, 1976. The account was in the name of the settlor as trustee for the benefit of Josephine Piper (beneficiary). Concurrent with the opening of the account, settlor executed a form trust agreement. The settlor made several deposits and withdrawals but never revoked nor modified the trust agreement or the savings account. The front of the trust agreement identified the settlor. The reverse side, also signed by the settlor, provided:

"TRUST AGREEMENT

"The funds in the account identified on the reverse side hereof, together with earnings thereon, and any future additions thereto, are by these presents hereby assigned, transferred, conveyed and delivered to the trustee (identified on reverse side) for the benefit of the beneficiary or beneficiaries named (on reverse side). The conditions of said trust are: (1) The trustee is authorized to hold, manage, invest and re-invest said funds in his sole discretion; (2) The undersigned Settlor reserves the right to revoke said trust in part or in full at any time, and any partial or complete withdrawal by the original trustee, if he is the Settlor, shall be a revocation to the extent of such withdrawal, but no other revocation shall be valid unless written notice by the Settlor is given to the Association; (3) This trust, subject to the right of revocation, shall continue for the life of the Settlor, and thereafter as hereinafter specified: (a) If, upon the death of the Settlor, the beneficiary has reached his legal majority, the trust shall terminate and the proceeds delivered to the beneficiary; (b) If, upon the death of the Settlor, the beneficiary has not reached his legal majority, then the legally appointed guardian of the estate of the beneficiary, shall act as successor trustee hereunder for the support, education and maintenance of the minor, provided, however, if the balance of funds accountable to the minor be less than $1,000.00 any adult with whom the minor resides may act as successor trustee, upon application to and acceptance of such adult by the Association; said successor trustee shall, in addition to his powers to administer this trust as successor trustee, have the full power to terminate this trust and take possession of the funds as Guardian (or Custodian if under $1,000 provision applies) of the minor beneficiary's estate, and the receipt of such guardian shall be a complete discharge to the Association. In any event, this trust shall terminate and the proceeds shall be delivered to the beneficiary when he reaches his legal majority, subject to the condition precedent that the Settlor is then deceased; (4) Two or more named beneficiaries shall have equal interests, one such share for each beneficiary living at the time of distribution. If any beneficiary shall die before distribution, his interest shall abate and be paid on an equal basis to the surviving beneficiaries unless such deceased beneficiary shall have one or more descendants then living, in which case the deceased beneficiary's share shall be divided, per stirpes, among said descendants. The word descendants, as used herein, shall include those persons legally adopted into such status as well as those born therein. If, upon the death of the Settlor, there should be a complete failure of the beneficiaries of this trust, then the funds shall be considered owned in their entirety by the Settlor and shall be part of his estate; (5) The original trustee is authorized at the discretion of said trustee, to delegate by written power of attorney, an attorney in fact to act on behalf of said trustee and upon any such appointment, the Association is authorized to act with respect to the account upon the signature of either the trustee or the attorney. Any such power granted shall terminate upon written notice to the Association by the trustee, or upon the death or incompetency of the original trustee, and the provisions of this trust shall govern the disposition of the funds; (6) The Association is authorized to pay the same or act in any respect affecting said account before or after the termination of this trust upon the signature of the trustee or successor trustee, or any attorney in fact, and has no responsibility to follow the application of the funds.

"In this instrument, the singular includes the plural and the masculine includes the feminine and the neuter.

On November 14, 1979, the beneficiary died leaving five heirs. Approximately four and one-half months later, on March 26, 1980, the settlor died. The question before this court is whether the proceeds of this account become part of the estate of the settlor, or that of the beneficiary.

Initially, the administrator of the settlor's estate suggests the savings account trust is a "Totten" trust. In Re Totten (1904), 179 N.Y. 112, 125, 71 N.E. 748, first recognized the type of property disposition now referred to as a "Totten trust."

"(A) deposit by one person of his own money, in his own name as trustee for another, standing alone, does not establish an irrevocable trust during the lifetime of the depositor. It is a tentative trust merely, revocable at will, until the depositor dies or completes the gift within his lifetime by some unequivocal act or declaration, such as delivery of the pass book or notice to the beneficiary."

Because generally the beneficial interest in a Totten trust does not vest until the death of the settlor, the general rule developed in other jurisdictions (the issue has apparently not yet arisen in Illinois) that if the beneficiary predeceases the settlor, the trust fails and the corpus of the trust reverts to the estate of the settlor. See e.g. ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Estate of Davis, In re
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • 10 d2 Março d2 1992
    ...179 N.Y. 112, 125-26, 71 N.E. 748, 752), aff'd (1965), 32 Ill.2d 134, 138, 204 N.E.2d 1; see also In re Estate of Capocy (1981), 102 Ill.App.3d 609, 611-12, 58 Ill.Dec. 880, 430 N.E.2d 1131.) IRA No. 5013 is not a savings account, nor is the decedent the trustee It is not as clear, however,......
  • Hillyer v. Hillyer
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • 6 d1 Outubro d1 1986
    ...rather a valid, revocable inter vivos trust and any rules governing Totten trusts do not apply. See In re Estate of Capocy (1981), 102 Ill.App.3d 609, 612, 58 Ill.Dec. 880, 430 N.E.2d 1131. Plaintiffs contend that the language of the instrument establishes an irrevocable gift. They rely on ......
  • Zeunert v. Quail Ridge Partnership
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • 14 d1 Dezembro d1 1981
  • Clay v. Woods
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • 30 d1 Dezembro d1 1985
    ...unequivocal act or declaration, such as delivery of the passbook or notice to the beneficiary. (See In re Estate of Capocy (1981), 102 Ill.App.3d 609, 611, 58 Ill.Dec. 880, 430 N.E.2d 1131.) In Montgomery v. Michaels the deceased during her lifetime created and retained control over several......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • When Beneficiaries Predecease: an Empirical Analysis
    • United States
    • Emory University School of Law Emory Law Journal No. 72-2, 2022
    • Invalid date
    ...Dist. Ct App. 1941); Sherman v. Hibernia Sav. & Loan Soc'y, 20 P.2d 138, 140 (Cal. App. Dep't Super. Ct. 1933); In re Estate of Capocy, 430 N.E.2d 1131, 1134 (Ill. App. Ct. 1981); First Nat'l Bank v. Anthony, 557 A.2d 957, 960 (Me. 1989); Detroit Bank & Tr. Co. v. Grout, 289 N.W.2d 898, 909......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT