Caputo v. Continental Const. Corp.
| Decision Date | 07 December 1959 |
| Citation | 340 Mass. 15,162 N.E.2d 813 |
| Parties | Joseph L. CAPUTO v. CONTINENTAL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Allan R. Kingston, Somerville, for plaintiff.
Lawrence H. Adler, Watertown, Fred Ross, Boston, for defendant.
Before WILKINS, C. J., and SPALDING, WILLIAMS, COUNIHAN, and CUTTER, JJ.
The defendant, as general contractor, entered into a contract with the Commonwealth for the repair and construction of the French King Bridge. Thereafter subcontracts for certain work and materials for the bridge were made by the plaintiff and the defendant. The plaintiff seeks in this action to recover for labor and materials furnished to the defendant under three contracts. The action was tried with a cross-action brought by the defendant to recover damages for alleged breaches of contracts by the plaintiff. The judge found for the plaintiff in the original action and the case is here on the defendant's exceptions.
The question for decision arises out of a ruling on evidence which occurred in these circumstances. The contracts which are the basis of counts 1, 2, and 3 are three letters which are set forth below. 1 The defendant sought to show through Ragone, its president, conversations with the plaintiff prior to March 28, 1955, the date of the first of the three letters. This evidence was objected to by the plaintiff but the judge admitted it de bene. Ragone testified that on or about March 25, 1955, he had a telephone conversation with the plaintiff during which Ragone had 'stressed to * * * [the plaintiff] the importance of getting the work quickly started and of speedily completing the project * * * so as to enable the defendant to take advantage of the bonus clause in its master contract with the Commonwealth.' Ragone further testified that the parties had 'also agreed that the plaintiff would be paid by the defendant in the same manner as the defendant was paid by the Commonwealth * * * and that the plaintiff would carry the insurance required by the specifications' for the job. Evidence was also admitted de bene that the plaintiff had neither supplied the materials nor performed the work 'as called on by the defendant' and by failing to do so had delayed the completion of the job with the result that the defendant lost the bonus it might have received had the plaintiff performed seasonably.
Thereafter, subject to the defendant's exception, the judge ordered struck from the record all the evidence admitted de bene 'pertaining to the alleged terms and performance of the * * * oral agreement.'
The governing principles of law are very familiar and need not be restated. Unless the letters can be said to state the entire agreements of the parties, the excluded evidence should have been admitted. Glackin v. Bennett, 226 Mass. 316, 319, 115 N.E. 490; Kerwin v. Donaghy, 317 Mass. 559, 567-568, 59 N.E.2d 299, and cases cited. We are of opinion that the letters did not state the entire agreements and that the excluded evidence was admissible. Matters of importance which normally would be included in contracts of the sort under consideration would be the time when the plaintiff was to complete performance, the method of payment, provisions as to insurance, and the specifications and standards to be complied with. None of the letters sheds any light on these matters. This indicates, we think, that the parties never intended that the letters were to constitute their entire agreements. In these circumstances extrinsic evidence was admissible. Peerless Petticoat Co. v. Colpak-Van Costume Co., 273 Mass. 289, 292, 173 N.E. 429; Kesslen Shoe Co. Inc. v. Philadelphia Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 295 Mass. 123, 131, 3 N.E.2d 257; International Business Mach. Corp. v. Quinn Bros. Elec. Co., 321 Mass. 16, 19, 71 N.E.2d 406; Cotty v. Meister, Mass., 158 N.E.2d 309.
Exceptions sustained.
1 'March 28, 1955
'Continental Const. Co.
437 Main St.
Lynnfield, Mass.
Re: French King Bridge
Erving--Gill
'Gentlemen:
'Confirming our verbal agreement, we will furnish and deliver in accordance with plans, f. o. b. above job for the sum of Twenty Seven Thousand Five Hundred ($27,500.00) Dollars the following items:
16 Scuppers
Curb plates
anchor bolts & lead sheets for fence
New expansion joints
1 steel ladder
catwalk & gratings
'We will erect:
Angles only, adjacent to scuppers.
Curb plates in one operation, after the reinforcing for curb is installed by you, to which we will attach the curb plates.
Removing & re-erecting fence and we expect to lash this fence to fence on opposite side.
One steel ladder.
Catwalk complete in one operation after concrete deck has been removed by you.
'We do not install:
Scuppers
Anchor bolts for fence
Approach half of expansion joints
No field painting.
'Very truly yours,
Builders Iron Works
[Signed] Joseph L. Caputo
'JLC/lg
We accept the above
Continental Const. By [Signed] Joseph G. Ragone, Pres.'
'May 6, 1955
'Continental Construction Company
437 Main Street
Lynnfield Center, Mass.
'Attention: Mr. Ragone
'Gentlemen:
'As per our recent telephone conversation we informed you that we have located 8 X 4 angle stock for the catwalk from a stock supplier. Due to additional weight and price factors an additional $950.00 is required to facilitate purchase of this material.
'It will advance delivery at least 30 days. At your recommendation and agreement to pay this additional sum we have placed an order for...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re Inofin
...of Contracts § 209 cmt. c. (1979). See Rokowsky v. Gordon, 501 F.Supp. 1114, 1121 (D.Mass.1980); Caputo v. Continental Construction Corp., 340 Mass. 15, 18, 162 N.E.2d 813, 816 (1959). However, the determination of whether an agreement is integrated is determined by the court as a question ......
-
Joseph E. Bennett Co. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.
...341 Mass. 326, 329, 169 N.E.2d 882. Compare Cotty v. Meister, 339 Mass. 202, 204-205, 158 N.E.2d 309; Caputo v. Continental Const. Corp., 340 Mass. 15, 18-19, 162 N.E.2d 813. This is not a suit to reform the contracts contained in the policies (cf. De Vincent Ford Sales, Inc. v. First Mass.......
-
Chas. T. Main, Inc. v. Massachusetts Turnpike Authority
...were reasonable. 4. This is not an abbreviated agreement by correspondence, such as that considered in Caputo v. Continental Constr. Corp., 340 Mass. 15, 16-17, 162 N.E.2d 813. There we said that extrinsic evidence should have been admitted to show '[m]atters of importance which normally wo......
-
Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Company
...denied Black Diamond Lines v. United States Navigation Co., 315 U.S. 816, 62 S.Ct. 805, 86 L.Ed. 1214; Caputo v. Continental Const. Corp., Mass., Dec. 7, 1959, 162 N.E.2d 813, 816; Lawrence v. Tandy & Allen, Inc., 14 N.J. 1, 100 A. 2d 891; Jarvis v. Cunliffe, 140 Conn. 297, 99 A.2d 126; Rin......