Carden v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Decision Date29 November 1984
Citation105 A.D.2d 1048,483 N.Y.S.2d 486
PartiesRobert E. CARDEN et al., Respondents, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ainsworth, Sullivan, Tracy & Knauf, Albany (Nancy L. Burritt, Albany, of counsel), for appellant.

King, Murphy, Adang & Arpey, Saratoga Springs (Peter G. Sipperly, Saratoga Springs, of counsel), for respondents.

Before MAIN, J.P., and WEISS, MIKOLL, YESAWICH and HARVEY, JJ.

MEMORANDUM DECISION.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered May 1, 1984 in Washington County, which denied defendant's motion for a protective order.

On October 6, 1982, fire destroyed plaintiffs' residence which was covered against fire loss under a homeowner's policy issued by defendant.The next day, defendant's senior claims representative conducted an investigation at the scene.In an affidavit attached to defendant's moving papers, the claims representative avers that he found a fire pattern which did not conform to any natural source; that he discussed the fire with the Washington County arson investigator; and that he took a statement from plaintiffShirley H. Carden concerning the fire, which disclosed that plaintiffs had been unable to sell their home and had been beset by financial difficulties before the fire.Suspecting arson, the claims representative engaged an independent arson investigator on October 8, 1982 to further document the circumstances of the fire; approximately two weeks later, defendant retained counsel in this matter.Proofs of loss were furnished to defendant as required and plaintiffs were examined pursuant to the terms of the policy.Following receipt of defendant's letter of March 7, 1983, disclaiming liability, plaintiffs commenced this action predicated on defendant's alleged breach of the insurance contract.

Plain...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • Cascade Builders Corp. v. Rugar
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 19, 2017
    ...153 A.D.3d at 480, 60 N.Y.S.3d 210 ; see Donohue v. Fokas, 112 A.D.3d 665, 667, 976 N.Y.S.2d 559 [2013] ; Carden v. Allstate Ins. Co., 105 A.D.2d 1048, 1049, 483 N.Y.S.2d 486 [1984] ). Notably, all the documents set forth in the subject privilege log were prepared prior to Utica First's May......
  • Madison Mut. Ins. Co. v. Expert Chimney Servs., Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 21, 2013
    ...A.D.3d 486, 487, 878 N.Y.S.2d 727 [2009];Martino v. Kalbacher, 225 A.D.2d 862, 863, 639 N.Y.S.2d 144 [1996];Carden v. Allstate Ins. Co., 105 A.D.2d 1048, 1049, 483 N.Y.S.2d 486 [1984] ). “[T]his burden cannot be satisfied with wholly conclusory allegations” ( Claverack Coop. Ins. Co. v. Nie......
  • Perfido v. Messina
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 31, 1986
    ...her burden of demonstrating that the items were indeed prepared solely for the purpose of litigation (see, Carden v. Allstate Ins. Co., 105 A.D.2d 1048, 483 N.Y.S.2d 486; Du Four v. Blaw-Knox Corp., 89 A.D.2d 900, 454 N.Y.S.2d 12; Hunt v. Joseph, 67 A.D.2d 697, 412 N.Y.S.2d In any event, si......
  • Pinkans v. Hulett
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 21, 1989
    ...that the statement sought to be disclosed is indeed exempt from disclosure (see, CPLR 3101[d][2]; Carden v. Allstate Ins. Co., 105 A.D.2d 1048, 1049, 483 N.Y.S.2d 486). His counsel's assertion, without more, that Clark's statement to his insurance carrier was material prepared for litigatio......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT