Carey v. Beans

Citation659 F.2d 1065
PartiesCarey v. Beans 80-2769
Decision Date28 May 1981
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)

E.D.Pa., 500 F.Supp. 580

AFFIRMED

To continue reading

Request your trial
28 cases
  • Cemar, Inc. v. Nissan Motor Corp. In USA
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Delaware
    • 29 de janeiro de 1988
    ... ... This is a procedure usually used only when a plaintiff seeks to amend a complaint after a summary judgment motion has been filed. See, e.g., Carey 678 F. Supp. 1106 v. Beans, 500 F.Supp. 580, 582 (E.D.Pa. 1980) (requiring substantial evidence to support the new claims), aff'd. mem., 659 ... ...
  • Colgan v. Fisher Scientific Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • 19 de junho de 1991
    ... ... See Hurd v. Williams, 755 F.2d 306, 308 (3d Cir.1985); Carey v. Beans, 500 F.Supp. 580, 583 (E.D.Pa.1980), aff'd, 659 F.2d 1065 (3d Cir.1981) ... 16 We realize, of course, that the record does not compel a ... ...
  • Gonzales v. North Tp. of Lake County
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Indiana
    • 28 de julho de 1992
    ... ... made upon personal knowledge, be devoid of hearsay, conclusory language, and statements which purport to examine thoughts as well as actions." Carey v. Beans, 500 F.Supp. 580, 583 (E.D.Pa.1980), aff'd, 659 F.2d 1065 (3rd Cir.1981) ...         Familiarity with the proceedings does not ... ...
  • Sodexomagic, LLC v. Drexel Univ.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • 2 de agosto de 2018
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT