Carey v. City of Fall River, 88-1895

Decision Date09 January 1989
Docket NumberNo. 88-1895,88-1895
Citation870 F.2d 40
PartiesPaul J. CAREY, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. CITY OF FALL RIVER, et al., Defendants, Appellees. . Heard
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit

Max Volterra (argued), with whom Volterra, Goldberg & Mangiaratti, Attleboro, Mass., was on brief, for plaintiffs, appellants.

Daniel J. O'Connell, III, Boston, Mass., for defendant, appellee Lionel J. Desrochers.

John J. Harrington, Fall River, Mass., for defendant, appellee Raymond E. Conroy.

Before CAMPBELL, Chief Judge, and ALDRICH and COFFIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

After careful review of the record, briefs, and arguments, we affirm for substantially the reasons set forth in the district court's opinion. Carey v. City of Fall River, --- F.Supp. ---- (D.Mass.1988). We note in particular our agreement with the district court that "It cannot be said that when defendants in this case sought out the criminal complaint against Paul Carey they 'clearly' did not have probable cause." --- F.Supp. at ---- n. 1. Because there was no clear lack of probable cause, defendants cannot be held liable for violating plaintiff's substantive due process rights on a malicious prosecution theory. Floyd v. Farrell, 765 F.2d 1, 5 (1st Cir.1985).

AFFIRMED.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Long v. Dietrich
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Alabama
    • September 20, 2012
    ...probable cause defeats a § 1983 malicious prosecution claim. Kjellsen, 517 F.3d at 1237; Wood, 323 F.3d at 881-82; Carey v. City of Fall River, 870 F.2d 40 (1st Cir. 1989) ("Because there was no clear lack of probable cause, defendants cannot be held liable for violating plaintiff's substan......
  • Franco-De Jerez v. Burgos, FRANCO-DE
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • April 6, 1989
    ...violate the Constitution, however, if Burgos had probable cause to believe that Franco had committed a crime. Carey v. City of Fall River, 870 F.2d 40 (1st Cir.1989) (per curiam) (officers can be liable under Sec. 1983 for seeking a criminal complaint only if they lacked probable cause); Lo......
  • Sietins v. Joseph
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts
    • January 6, 2003
    ...they had probable cause to seek the complaint at the time, such officers are insulated from liability. See, e.g., Carey v. City of Fall River, 870 F.2d 40, 40 (1st Cir.1989) (concluding probable cause protected officers who "sought out the criminal complaint"); Franco-de Jerez v. Burgos, 87......
  • Silverman v. CBS Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • February 6, 1989
    ... ...         Barry I. Fredericks, New York City (Aurnou & Fredericks, New York City, on the brief), for ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT