Carey v. Lincoln Loan Co., No. S53242.
| Court | Supreme Court of Oregon |
| Citation | 143 P.3d 772,341 Or. 449 |
| Docket Number | No. S53242. |
| Parties | CAREY v. LINCOLN LOAN CO. |
| Decision Date | 26 September 2006 |
(A117696) 203 Or.App. 399, 125 P.3d 814.
Petition for review allowed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 practice notes
-
Vasquez-Lopez v. Beneficial Oregon, Inc., 021010108.
...favorable to the party with the greater power." Carey v. Lincoln Loan Co., 203 Or.App. 399, 422, 125 P.3d 814 (2005), rev. allowed, 341 Or. 449, 143 P.3d 772 (2006). Thus, although there is some minor overlap between the legal theory deployed against the substantive terms of the loan contra......
-
Motsinger v. Lithia Rose-Ft, Inc., 04CV2574CC.
...clause was the product of deception or compulsion. See Carey v. Lincoln Loan Co., 203 Or.App. 399, 422, 125 P.3d 814 (2005), rev. allowed, 341 Or. 449, 143 P.3d 772 (2006) (unconscionability may involve deception, compulsion, or genuine lack of consent). As defendant points out, it did not ......
2 cases
-
Vasquez-Lopez v. Beneficial Oregon, Inc., 021010108.
...favorable to the party with the greater power." Carey v. Lincoln Loan Co., 203 Or.App. 399, 422, 125 P.3d 814 (2005), rev. allowed, 341 Or. 449, 143 P.3d 772 (2006). Thus, although there is some minor overlap between the legal theory deployed against the substantive terms of the loan contra......
-
Motsinger v. Lithia Rose-Ft, Inc., 04CV2574CC.
...clause was the product of deception or compulsion. See Carey v. Lincoln Loan Co., 203 Or.App. 399, 422, 125 P.3d 814 (2005), rev. allowed, 341 Or. 449, 143 P.3d 772 (2006) (unconscionability may involve deception, compulsion, or genuine lack of consent). As defendant points out, it did not ......