Carey v. Musladin

Decision Date17 April 2006
Docket NumberNo. 05-785.,05-785.
CitationCarey v. Musladin, 126 S.Ct. 1769, 164 L.Ed.2d 515, 547 U.S. 1069 (2006)
CourtU.S. Supreme Court
PartiesCAREY, WARDEN v. MUSLADIN.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted.Certiorari granted.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • State v. Iromuanya
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • August 11, 2006
    ...of error is illustrated by comparison to Musladin v. Lamarque, 427 F.3d 653 (9th Cir.2005), cert. granted sub nom. ___ U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 1769, 164 L.Ed.2d 515 (2006), the single case cited by Iromuanya in support of his argument. Musladin involved a murder prosecution in which the defenda......
  • U.S. v. Larson
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • August 28, 2006
    ...because spectators wore buttons depicting the alleged victim's photograph), cert. granted sub nom. Carey v. Musladin, ___ U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 1769, 164 L.Ed.2d 515 (2006); United States v. Olvera, 30 F.3d 1195, 1198 (9th Cir.1994) (reversing a conviction because the defendant was compelled ......
  • Carey v. Musladin
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • December 11, 2006
    ...427 F.3d, at 659-660. The Court of Appeals denied rehearing en banc. 427 F.3d 647 (2005). We granted certiorari, 547 U.S. 1069, 126 S.Ct. 1769, 164 L.Ed.2d 515 (2006), and now vacate.II Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, 110 Stat. 1219: “(d) An application for ......
  • Chavez v. Yates
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • December 15, 2011
    ...2009) (reversing a murder conviction becausespectators wore buttons depicting the alleged victim's photograph) (overruled by Carey v. Musladin, 547 U.S. 1069 (2006)),2 Chavez argues "the presence of the photograph of the decease[d] sitting in full view of the jury throughout the entire tria......
  • Get Started for Free