CARL v. CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, No. 93-CV-1476

Docket NºNo. 93-CV-1476
Citation665 A.2d 650
Case DateSeptember 26, 1995
CourtCourt of Appeals of Columbia District
665 A.2d 650
Linda C. CARL, Appellant, v. CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, Appellee.
No. 93-CV-1476.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
September 26, 1995.

Before WAGNER, Chief Judge, and FERREN, TERRY, STEADMAN, SCHWELB, FARRELL, KING, RUIZ and REID, Associate Judges.

PER CURIAM.


ORDER

On consideration of appellant's petition for rehearing en banc, and the opposition thereto; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

ORDERED that appellant's petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of April 10, 1995, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc on Thursday, October 12, 1995, at 9:30 a.m. Counsel should be present in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals courtroom, located at 500 Indiana Avenue, NW, on the sixth floor, on the date indicated above no later than 9:25 a.m. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before October 3, 1995.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 practice notes
  • Hall v. Dist. of Columbia, 16-7056
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • August 11, 2017
    ...in good faith to law enforcement authorities." Carter v. Hahn , 821 A.2d 890, 894 (D.C. 2003) (quoting Columbia First Bank v. Ferguson , 665 A.2d 650, 655 (D.C. 1995) ). No privilege attaches to a statement made "without just cause or excuse, with such a conscious indifference or reckless d......
  • Carl v. Children's Hosp., 93-CV-1476.
    • United States
    • District of Columbia Court of Appeals of Columbia District
    • September 23, 1997
    ...action.4 702 A.2d 161 Carl v. Children's Hospital, 657 A.2d 286, 288 (hereafter "Carl I"), vacated on grant of rehearing en banc, 665 A.2d 650 The hospital moved under Super. Ct. Civ. R. 12(b)(6) to dismiss Ms. Carl's complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted......
  • Blodgett v. University Club, 04-CV-810.
    • United States
    • District of Columbia Court of Appeals of Columbia District
    • August 9, 2007
    ...the circumstances that Blodgett's conduct was a matter of common interest to the Club and its Board. See Columbia First Bank v. Ferguson, 665 A.2d 650, 655 (D.C.1995) ("Whether a statement is protected by a privilege is a question of law for the court."). The defendant Board members, called......
  • BIBLE WAY CHURCH v. BEARDS, 95-CV-311
    • United States
    • District of Columbia Court of Appeals of Columbia District
    • July 24, 1996
    ...promise must be relied on to detriment of promisee). 8. See Carl v. Children's Hospital, 657 A.2d 286 (D.C.), vacated and reh'g granted, 665 A.2d 650 (D.C. 1995) (per curiam), No. 93-CV-1476 argued en banc Oct. 12, 1995 (pending decision). In Carl, this court has under advisement the questi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
12 cases
  • Carl v. Children's Hosp., 93-CV-1476.
    • United States
    • District of Columbia Court of Appeals of Columbia District
    • September 23, 1997
    ...action.4 702 A.2d 161 Carl v. Children's Hospital, 657 A.2d 286, 288 (hereafter "Carl I"), vacated on grant of rehearing en banc, 665 A.2d 650 The hospital moved under Super. Ct. Civ. R. 12(b)(6) to dismiss Ms. Carl's complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted......
  • Blodgett v. University Club, 04-CV-810.
    • United States
    • District of Columbia Court of Appeals of Columbia District
    • August 9, 2007
    ...the circumstances that Blodgett's conduct was a matter of common interest to the Club and its Board. See Columbia First Bank v. Ferguson, 665 A.2d 650, 655 (D.C.1995) ("Whether a statement is protected by a privilege is a question of law for the court."). The defendant Board members, called......
  • BIBLE WAY CHURCH v. BEARDS, 95-CV-311
    • United States
    • District of Columbia Court of Appeals of Columbia District
    • July 24, 1996
    ...promise must be relied on to detriment of promisee). 8. See Carl v. Children's Hospital, 657 A.2d 286 (D.C.), vacated and reh'g granted, 665 A.2d 650 (D.C. 1995) (per curiam), No. 93-CV-1476 argued en banc Oct. 12, 1995 (pending decision). In Carl, this court has under advisement the questi......
  • Wallace v. Skadden, Arps, 96-CV-34
    • United States
    • District of Columbia Court of Appeals of Columbia District
    • July 30, 1998
    ...of Columbia, 399 A.2d 213, 220-21 (D.C. 1979); Elliott v. Healthcare Corp., 629 A.2d 6, 9 (D.C.1993); Columbia First Bank v. Ferguson, 665 A.2d 650, 656 (D.C.1995); Edwards v. James Stewart & Co., 82 U.S.App. D.C. 123, 124, 160 F.2d 935, 936 In order to overcome the privilege, it is "incumb......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT