CARL v. CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
| Court | D.C. Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | Per Curiam |
| Citation | CARL v. CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, 665 A.2d 650 (D.C. 1995) |
| Decision Date | 26 September 1995 |
| Docket Number | No. 93-CV-1476,93-CV-1476 |
| Parties | Linda C. CARL, Appellant, v. CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, Appellee. |
Before WAGNER, Chief Judge, and FERREN, TERRY, STEADMAN, SCHWELB, FARRELL, KING, RUIZ and REID, Associate Judges.
ORDER
On consideration of appellant's petition for rehearing en banc, and the opposition thereto; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is
ORDERED that appellant's petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of April 10, 1995, are hereby vacated. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc on Thursday, October 12, 1995, at 9:30 a.m. Counsel should be present in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals courtroom, located at 500 Indiana Avenue, NW, on the sixth floor, on the date...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
12 cases
-
Carl v. Children's Hosp., 93-CV-1476.
...malpractice action.4 Carl v. Children's Hospital, 657 A.2d 286, 288 (hereafter "Carl I"), vacated on grant of rehearing en banc, 665 A.2d 650 (D.C.1995). The hospital moved under Super. Ct. Civ. R. 12(b)(6) to dismiss Ms. Carl's complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could......
- Blodgett v. University Club
-
BIBLE WAY CHURCH v. BEARDS
...on to detriment of promisee). 8. See Carl v. Children's Hospital, 657 A.2d 286 (D.C.), vacated and reh'g granted, 665 A.2d 650 (D.C. 1995) (per curiam), No. 93-CV-1476 argued en banc Oct. 12, 1995 (pending decision). In Carl, this court has under advisement the question whether the public p......
-
Wallace v. Skadden, Arps, 96-CV-34
... ... to the employment at-will doctrine was recently modified in some measure by our decision in Carl v. Children's Hosp., 702 A.2d 159 (D.C. 1997) (en banc) (per curiam). We have not yet had occasion ... ...
Get Started for Free