Carlelli v. City of New York

CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division
Citation21 A.D.2d 780,252 N.Y.S.2d 273
Decision Date25 June 1964
PartiesMichael P. CARELLI, an infant by his Guardian ad Litem, John Carelli, and John Carelli individually Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, The Board of Education of The City of New York, Harold Taus and Stephen Taus, an infant by his Guardian ad Litem, Harold Taus, Defendants-Respondents.

Page 273

252 N.Y.S.2d 273
21 A.D.2d 780
Michael P. CARELLI, an infant by his Guardian ad Litem, John
Carelli, and John Carelli individually Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
The CITY OF NEW YORK, The Board of Education of The City of
New York, Harold Taus and Stephen Taus, an infant
by his Guardian ad Litem, Harold Taus,
Defendants-Respondents.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Dipartment.
June 25, 1964.

E. Estroff, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellants.

J. A. Murray, M. M. Baxter, New York City, for defendants-respondents.

Judgment, entered July 25, 1963 on an order, directing a verdict in favor of defendants, unanimously affirmed with costs to respondents. (cf.Rapisardi v. Board of Education, 242 App.Div. 647, 273 N.Y.S. 360; Lutzker v. Board of Education, 262 App.Div. 881, 28 N.Y.S.2d 496, aff'd. 287 N.Y. 822, 41 N.E.2d 97; Zarillo v. State of New York, 8 A.D.2d 651, 185 N.Y.S.2d 101, aff'd 7 N.Y.2d 943, 198 N.Y.S.2d 314, 165 N.E.2d 877).

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 practice notes
  • Diaz v. City of New York
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 27 Enero 1966
    ...N. Y., 17 A.D.2d 191, 233 N.Y.S.2d 330, and lv. to app. den., 12 N.Y.2d 648, 239 N.Y.S.2d 1025, 190 N.E.2d 27; Carelli v. City of N. Y., 21 A.D.2d 780, 252 N.Y.S.2d 273; and see Rivera v. City of N. Y., 11 N.Y.2d 856, 227 N.Y.S.2d 676, 182 N.E.2d 284.) Were we not dismissing the complaint, ......
1 cases
  • Diaz v. City of New York
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 27 Enero 1966
    ...N. Y., 17 A.D.2d 191, 233 N.Y.S.2d 330, and lv. to app. den., 12 N.Y.2d 648, 239 N.Y.S.2d 1025, 190 N.E.2d 27; Carelli v. City of N. Y., 21 A.D.2d 780, 252 N.Y.S.2d 273; and see Rivera v. City of N. Y., 11 N.Y.2d 856, 227 N.Y.S.2d 676, 182 N.E.2d 284.) Were we not dismissing the complaint, ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT