Carlos v. WHP 19, LLC
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
| Citation | Carlos v. WHP 19, LLC, 301 A.D.2d 423, 752 N.Y.S.2d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003) |
| Decision Date | 16 January 2003 |
| Parties | MOWBRAY CARLOS et al., Respondents,<BR>v.<BR>W.H.P. 19, LLC, et al., Appellants. |
The 65-year-old plaintiff suffered a nondisplaced fracture of the calcaneus bone and a tear of the anterior ligament in the lateral aspect of the ankle, which, according to his expert, resulted in progressive degenerative changes and a permanent restriction of motion thereby limiting his ability to walk on some surfaces. Defendants' expert confirmed that plaintiff's loss of motion in his foot and ankle, rated at 50%, is permanent. Given these facts, the jury's future pain and suffering award of $36,500 over 14.6 years, which translates to $2,500 per year, deviates materially from what is reasonable compensation. However, inasmuch as the calcaneus fracture has healed and plaintiff no longer requires crutches or takes medication for the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Oakes v. Patel
...36 A.D.3d 495, 828 N.Y.S.2d 53; Rivera v. Lincoln Ctr. for Performing Arts, Inc., 16 A.D.3d 274, 792 N.Y.S.2d 39; Carlos v. W.H.P. 19, 301 A.D.2d 423, 752 N.Y.S.2d 874), inasmuch as the amounts set by the court did not represent “the minimum amount[s] that the jury could have found as a mat......
-
Oakes v. Patel
...Dept.2007]; Rivera v. Lincoln Ctr. for Performing Arts, Inc., 16 A.D.3d 274, 792 N.Y.S.2d 39 [1st Dept.2005]; Carlos v. W.H.P. 19, 301 A.D.2d 423, 752 N.Y.S.2d 874 [1st Dept.2003] ). In no such case, as far as we are aware, has the appellant's claim been held unpreserved for failure to spec......
-
Byrne v. Yeats Constr. Mgmt.
...his injury. See Medical Records at BYRN0077-78. In contrast, whereas Plaintiff's sole injury was his fractured calcaneus, the plaintiff in Carlos suffered the additional of a torn ligament in his ankle, and the plaintiff in Starr had four different injuries-a fractured calcaneus, multiple f......
- CENTENNIAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Hing Fa, Inc.