Carlson v. Workforce Safety & Ins.
| Docket Number | 20110163 |
| Decision Date | 01 October 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
24 cases
-
Willprecht v. Willprecht
...was affirmed on the first appeal. Id. at ¶ 25 ; Viscito v. Christianson , 2016 ND 139, ¶ 7, 881 N.W.2d 633 (quoting Carlson v. Workforce Safety & Ins. , 2012 ND 203, ¶ 16, 821 N.W.2d 760 ) ("The mandate rule, a more specific application of law of the case, requires the trial court to follow......
-
State v. Oden
...reopen and review claims under N.D.C.C. § 65-05-04. Plains Trucking, LLC v. Cresap , 2019 ND 226, ¶ 17, 932 N.W.2d 541 ; Carlson v. Workforce Safety & Ins. , 2012 ND 203, ¶ 14, 821 N.W.2d 760 ; see also N.D.C.C. § 65-01-16(10) ("Any notice of decision, administrative order, or posthearing a......
-
Plains Trucking, LLC v. Cresap
...retains statutory authority to exercise continuing jurisdiction to reopen and review claims under N.D.C.C. § 65-05-04. Carlson v. Workforce Safety & Ins. , 2012 ND 203, ¶ 14, 821 N.W.2d 760 ; see also N.D.C.C. § 65-01-16(10) ("Any notice of decision, administrative order, or posthearing adm......
-
Coppage v. State
...we retain the authority to decide whether the district court scrupulously and fully carried out our mandate's terms.’ ” Carlson v. Workforce Safety and Ins., 2012 ND 203, ¶ 16, 821 N.W.2d 760 (quoting Burckhard, at ¶ 7). [¶ 24] Here, the district court did not consider whether Coppage's pri......
Request a trial to view additional results