Carlton v. Conner

Decision Date15 December 1969
Docket NumberNo. 625,625
Citation396 U.S. 272,90 S.Ct. 481,24 L.Ed.2d 417
PartiesReuben CARLTON et al. v. Doyle CONNER, Commissioner of Agriculture
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

John R. Beranek and Charles H. Damsel, Jr., for appellants.

Robert A. Chastain, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

To continue reading

Request your trial
54 cases
  • Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Florida
    • 5 Octubre 1989
    ...(D.Minn. 1985); Conner v. Carlton, 223 So.2d 324 (Fla.1969), appeal dismissed for want of a substantial fed. ques., 396 U.S. 272, 90 S.Ct. 481, 24 L.Ed.2d 417 (1969). As discussed in detail in this Court's findings of fact, animal carcasses are often left in public places, leading to an inc......
  • United States v. Janis, No. 74-958
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 6 Julio 1976
  • United States v. Marshall
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 10 Febrero 1976
  • City of New Brunswick v. Speights
    • United States
    • New Jersey County Court
    • 14 Febrero 1978
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT