Carmack v. Janny
| Decision Date | 26 January 2022 |
| Docket Number | 21-844 (R46-14). |
| Citation | 142 S.Ct. 878 (Mem),211 L.Ed.2d 622 |
| Parties | Jim CARMACK v. Mark JANNY, et al. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
The petition for writ of certiorari was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46 of the Rules of this Court.
To continue reading
Request your trial
5 cases
-
Askew v. USP Leavenworth
... ... 56(a). A fact is ... “‘material' if it might affect the outcome of ... the suit under the governing law.” Janny v ... Gamez , 8 F.4th 883, 898 (10th Cir. 2021) (quoting ... Allen v. Muskogee , 119 F.3d 837, 839 (10th Cir ... 1997)), cert ... ...
-
Erie v. Hunter
...v. Nixon, 747 F.3d 537, 541-542 (8th Cir. 2014)); e.g., Janny v. Gamez, 8 F.4th 883, 905-911 (10th Cir. 2021), cert. dismissed, 142 S.Ct. 878 (2022) (applying Coercion Test to parolee's claim that he was coerced to attend Alcoholics Anonymous/Narcotics Anonymous (AA/NA), a faith-based subst......
-
Brandt v. Crone
...fair warning to the defendants that their alleged conduct was unconstitutional." (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. dismissed, 142 S.Ct. 878 (2022). Thus, Sheriff Crone is entitled to qualified immunity on Mr. Brandt's due-process claim. Conclusion [6] We affirm the district court's......
-
Winter v. Mansfield
...did it identify which of Defendants' facts he sought to controvert. See Janny v. Gamez, 8 F.4th 883, 899 (10th Cir. 2021), cert. denied, 142 S.Ct. 878 (2022) ("[T]he party opposing summary judgment must designate specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial." (quotations o......
Request a trial to view additional results