Carnathan v. State
| Decision Date | 18 April 1922 |
| Docket Number | 2 Div. 230. |
| Citation | 93 So. 50,18 Ala.App. 452 |
| Parties | CARNATHAN v. STATE |
| Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Choctaw County; Ben D. Turner, Judge.
Hays Carnathan was convicted of presenting a gun at another, and he appeals. Reversed, and judgment rendered, discharging defendant.
G. H Carnathan, of Butler, for appellant.
Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.
The question of importance presented by this record is whether the prosecution is barred by the statutes of limitation. More than 12 months before the return of the indictment a prosecution was begun against this defendant, charging him with robbery. The defendant waived examination, and was bound over to the grand jury on that charge. Upon investigating the charge, the grand jury refused to make presentment on the charge of robbery, but did return a bill charging the defendant with presenting a gun, under section 6893 of the Code of 1907, and it is here admitted that the act charged if committed, was committed more than 12 months before the return of the indictment. The warrant charging robbery, being relied on to save the running of the statute of limitation must of necessity embrace the charge included in the indictment for presenting a gun. If the indictment charges another distinct offense, although it may belong to the same family of offenses as that charged in the warrant, it cannot be a continuation of the prosecution begun by the issuance of the warrant. Jackson v. State, 106 Ala. 136, 17 So 349.
The charge of robbery was a crime under the common law against the person and property of another, and of necessity embraces all the lesser crimes growing out of the transaction, such as assault with intent to rob, attempt to rob, and larceny, grand and petit. 8 Michie's Dig. 665, § 115. But section 6893 of the Code of 1907, creating the offense against presenting a gun, is a mere police regulation, against the reckless or careless use of firearms, and contains none of the elements of that class of crimes relating to robberies.
The court was in error in permitting the defendant to be convicted on proof being made that the offense was committed more than 12 months before the finding of the indictment. For the error pointed out, the judgment is reversed, and, as it is agreed that the offense, if committed, was more than 12 months before the return of the indictment, a judgment will here be...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Rickard v. State
...assault, or for an assault and battery. Rambo v. State, 134 Ala. 71, 32 So. 650; Morris v. State, 97 Ala. 82, 12 So. 276; Carnathan v. State, 18 Ala.App. 452, 93 So. 50; Thomas v. State, 91 Ala. 34, 9 So. 81; Code 1928, § 8697, and many other authorities that might be When an indicted perso......
-
Beverly v. State, 8 Div. 146
...killed clearly embraces the crime of robbery. Robbery in turn embraces the lesser included offense of larceny. Carnathan v. State, 18 Ala.App. 452, 93 So. 50 (1922). However, as noted above, § 13A-5-31, Code of Alabama 1975, under which appellant was indicted specifically precluded any indi......
-
James v. State
...the following cases as authority: Rambo v. State, 134 Ala. 71, 32 So. 650; Morris v. State, 97 Ala. 82, 12 So. 276; Carnathan v. State, 18 Ala.App. 452, 93 So. 50; Thomas v. State, 91 Ala. 34, 9 So. Lastly, in the case of People v. Allie, 216 Mich. 133, 184 N.W. 423 (1921), it was held that......
-
Trammell v. State, 6 Div. 482
...55 So.2d 366 (1951); Kelly vs. State, 235 Ala. 5, 176 So. 807 (1937); Morris v. State, 97 Ala. 82, 12 So. 276 (1902); Carnathan v. State, 91 Ala. 34, (18 Ala.App. 452) 9 (93) So. 50 (1922); Thomas v. State, 91 Ala. 34, 9 So. 81 (1891). It is likewise true that if the evidence could only est......