Carney v. Guard Pub. Co.
| Court | Oregon Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | Before SCHWAB; THORNTON |
| Citation | Carney v. Guard Pub. Co., 630 P.2d 867, 48 Or.App. 927 (Or. App. 1980) |
| Decision Date | 02 October 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 89-2391,89-2391 |
| Parties | CARNEY, Respondent, v. GUARD PUBLISHING COMPANY, Appellant. ; CA 15485. . On Respondent's Petition for Reconsideration |
David Jensen and Hammons & Jensen, Eugene, for respondent.
Before SCHWAB, C. J., and THORNTON and RICHARDSON, JJ.
In this action for back pay for failure to reemploy a worker who sustained a compensable injury, we reversed plaintiff's damage award and remanded on the ground that the trial court erred by failing to give two of defendant's requested jury instructions. Carney v. Guard Publishing Co., 48 Or.App. 147, 616 P.2d 548 (1980). Plaintiff petitioned for review in the Supreme Court, and under Rule 10.10, Rules of Appellate Procedure, the case is automatically before us on petition for reconsideration.
The facts of the case are fully set out in our former opinion and need not be repeated here. Carney v. Guard Publishing Co., supra. Plaintiff contends that defendant, in oral argument before this court, specifically abandoned its third assignment of error regarding the question of what constitutes suitable reemployment of an injured worker under ORS 659.420(1). Plaintiff is correct that we inadvertently overlooked this concession on the part of defendant. Accordingly, since defendant's third assignment of error was not properly before us on review, we now withdraw that portion of our former opinion which addressed that issue. Carney v. Guard Publishing Co., supra, at 154-55, 616 P.2d 548.
Plaintiff's other contention involves a factual matter which was dealt with in footnote 4 of...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Flug v. University of Oregon
...her after her injury. Relying on our opinion in Carney v. Guard Publishing Co., 48 Or.App. 147, 152, 616 P.2d 548, on recons. 48 Or.App. 927, 630 P.2d 867, rev. den. 290 Or. 171 (1980), we concluded that ORS 659.420 "does not demand that an employer create positions or substitute an injured......
-
Knapp v. City of North Bend
...as it was used a companion provision, to mean "vacant." Carney v. Guard Publishing Co., 48 Or.App. 147, 616 P.2d 548, modified 48 Or.App. 927, 630 P.2d 867, rev. den. 290 Or. 171 (1980) (interpreting ORS ...
-
Blumhagen v. Clackamas County
...responsibilities between it and her former position. In Carney v. Guard Publishing Co., 48 Or.App. 147, 152, 616 P.2d 548, mod. 48 Or.App. 927, 630 P.2d 867, rev. den. 290 Or. 171 (1980), we recognized that, although the policy of the Handicapped Persons' Civil Rights Act is "the fullest em......
-
Williams v. Waterway Terminals Co.
...before he has recovered from his disability. See Carney v. Guard Publishing Co., 48 Or.App. 147, 153 n. 4, 616 P.2d 548, modified, 48 Or.App. 927, 630 P.2d 867, rev. den. 290 Or. 171 The second problem with the majority's opinion is that it ignores the relationship between ORS 659.415(1) an......