Carney v. Union Pacific R.R. Co.
| Docket Number | 118984 |
| Decision Date | 20 October 2016 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
46 cases
-
Hancock v. Mayor & City Council of Balt.
...support the conclusion that the duty recognized in § 411 does not "extend to job site employees." Carney v. Union Pac. R.R. Co. , 412 Ill.Dec. 833, 77 N.E.3d 1, 19 (Ill. 2016) ; see also Urena v. Capano Homes, Inc ., 930 A.2d 877, 880 (Del. 2007) (observing that "none of the illustrations t......
-
Andrews v. Metro. Water Reclamation Dist. of Greater Chi.
...an independent contractor is not liable for harm caused by the acts or omissions of the independent contractor. Carney v. Union Pacific R.R. Co. , 2016 IL 118984, ¶¶ 31, 33-35, 412 Ill.Dec. 833, 77 N.E.3d 1. This provision states:"One who entrusts work to an independent contractor, but who ......
-
Inman v. Howe Freightways, Inc.
...that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. 735 ILCS 5/2-1005(c) (West 2010); Carney v. Union Pacific R.R. Co. , 2016 IL 118984, ¶ 25, 412 Ill.Dec. 833, 77 N.E.3d 1. In determining whether a genuine issue of material fact exists, the court strictly construes the pleadi......
-
Snow v. Power Constr. Co.
...may be decided as a matter of law where the evidence is insufficient to create a factual question." Carney v. Union Pacific R.R. Co. , 2016 IL 118984, ¶ 41, 412 Ill.Dec. 833, 77 N.E.3d 1. Comment c to section 414 explains the concept of retained control for liability under the Restatement."......
Get Started for Free
