Carolina Coach Co. v. Williams, 6612.

Decision Date14 October 1953
Docket NumberNo. 6612.,6612.
Citation207 F.2d 408
PartiesCAROLINA COACH CO. v. WILLIAMS.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit

John J. Wicker, Jr., Richmond, Va. (Paul M. Shuford and Wicker, Baker & Shuford, Richmond, Va., on brief), for appellant.

Martin A. Martin and Oliver W. Hill, Richmond, Va. (Spottswood W. Robinson, III, Richmond, Va., C. O. Pearson, Durham, N. C., and Hill, Martin & Robinson, Richmond, Va., on brief), for appellee.

Woods, Rogers, Muse & Walker, Roanoke, Va., on brief for American Bus-lines and others as amici curiæ.

Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an award of $251 damages to a Negro passenger in an interstate bus on account of his having been wrongfully removed from the bus and prosecuted criminally for refusing to change his seat when ordered to do so by the bus driver. The defendant relies upon regulations of the bus company requiring the separate seating of white and Negro passengers. It appears that plaintiff was originally seated in accordance with the regulations and refused to change his seat when seats to the rear, originally occupied by Negroes, had become vacant. We think that the judgment appealed from should be affirmed because the regulations relied on were applied by the bus driver in an unreasonable manner in requiring the passenger to change his seat in an interstate journey after he had been properly seated in accordance with the regulations. Chance v. Lambeth, 4 Cir., 186 F. 2d 879; Henderson v. United States, 339 U.S. 816, 70 S.Ct. 843, 94 L.Ed. 1302; Whiteside v. Southern Bus Co., 6 Cir., 177 F.2d 949. Cf. Day v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp., 4 Cir., 171 F.2d 59.

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Boynton v. Commonwealth of Virginia
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • December 5, 1960
    ...discrimination of the kind shown here would violate § 216(d). Cf. Williams v. Carolina Coach Co., D.C., 111 F.Supp. 329, affirmed 4 Cir., 207 F.2d 408, and Keys v. Carolina Coach Co., 64 M.C.C. 769. Although this Court has not decided whether the same result would follow from a similar disc......
  • Williams v. Howard Johnson's Restaurant
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • July 16, 1959
    ...v. Com. of Virginia, 328 U.S. 373, 66 S.Ct. 1050, 90 L.Ed. 1317; Williams v. Carolina Coach Co., D.C.Va., 111 F.Supp. 329, affirmed 4 Cir., 207 F.2d 408; Flemming v. S. C. Elec. & Gas Co., 4 Cir., 224 F.2d 752; and Chance v. Lambeth, 4 Cir., 186 F.2d In every instance the conduct condemned ......
  • Eaton v. Grubbs
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of North Carolina
    • April 9, 1963
    ...States Supreme Court requiring the District Court to depart therefrom. Williams v. Carolina Coach Co., 111 F.Supp. 329, affirmed 4 Cir., 207 F.2d 408; Adkins v. School Board, 148 F.Supp. 430, affirmed 4 Cir., 246 F.2d 325; 21 C.J.S. Courts § Therefore, the decision of the Fourth Circuit Cou......
  • Spears v. Transcontinental Bus System
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • September 21, 1955
    ...Illinois-Greyhound Lines, 7 Cir., 1951, 192 F.2d 533; Williams v. Carolina Coach Co., D.C.E. D.Va.1952, 111 F.Supp. 329, affirmed, 4 Cir., 1953, 207 F.2d 408; Solomon v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1951, 96 F.Supp. ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT