Carp v. Texas State Board of Examiners In Optometry, 481

Decision Date01 October 1967
Docket NumberNo. 481,481
CitationCarp v. Texas State Board of Examiners In Optometry, 389 U.S. 52, 88 S.Ct. 241, 19 L.Ed.2d 51 (1967)
PartiesEllis CARP et al. v. TEXAS STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY et al
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Thurman Arnold, Robert E. Herzstein, Douglas E. Bergman, Quentin Keith and Price Daniel, for appellants.

Crawford C. Martin, Atty Gen. of Texas, George M. Cowden, First Asst. Atty. Gen., J. C. Davis and John Reeves, Asst. Attys. Gen., Will Garwood and Tom Gee, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., and A. J. Carubbi, Jr., for appellee Texas State Board of Examiners in Optometry.

Ellis Lyons, Bennett Boskey, Charles M. Babb and Mark Martin, for other appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
143 cases
  • Maryland Tuna Corporation v. Ms Benares
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • 2 Junio 1970
    ... ... was not sufficiently present in the State of New York to afford a basis for personal ... 786, 42 L.Ed. 1192 (1898); Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Murphy, 111 U.S. 488, 489, 4 ... ...
  • In re McLean Industries, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of New York
    • 29 Diciembre 1986
    ... ... allegedly owed it for fuel oil delivered on board the AMERICAN UTAH, a vessel owned by the debtor, ... located in London, England but its invoices state that it also has offices in Hong Kong, Norway, ... ...
  • Nordic Bank PLC v. Trend Group, Ltd.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • 17 Septiembre 1985
    ... ... The remaining counts in the complaint state common law claims ...         After ... Ekman was Chairman of the Board until April 20, 1983. Naper and Ekman remain ... to serve DnC at its office in Houston, Texas. That service was both untimely — well after ... ...
  • Freeman v. Gordon & Breach, Science Publishers, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • 29 Julio 1975
    ... ... in accordance with the law of the state where the court sits, with `federal law' entering ... ...
  • Get Started for Free