Carpenter v. Erie R. Co., 8179.

Decision Date16 December 1942
Docket NumberNo. 8179.,8179.
Citation132 F.2d 362
PartiesCARPENTER v. ERIE R. CO.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit

Laurie J. Carpenter, of New York City, pro se, for appellant.

Charles W. Broadhurst, of Jersey City, N. J. (Collins & Corbin and Edward A. Markley, all of Jersey City, N. J., on the brief), for appellee.

Before MARIS, JONES, and GOODRICH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this suit brought by an injured employee against a railroad company under the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U. S.C.A. § 51 et seq., it appears from the face of the complaint that the plaintiff's cause of action arose more than fourteen years before the suit was commenced. Since compliance with the two years limitation provided by Section 56 of the act is a condition precedent to recovery (Wabash Ry. Co. v. Bridal, 8 Cir., 1938, 94 F.2d 117) and it is, therefore, incumbent upon one suing under the act to allege and prove that his cause of action was brought within the time limited (American R. Co. of Porto Rico v. Coronas, 1 Cir., 1916, 230 F. 545) the district court had no alternative but to dismiss the complaint. Its judgment is accordingly affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
22 cases
  • Carr-Consolidated Biscuit Company v. Moore
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Pennsylvania
    • 25 de outubro de 1954
    ...R. Co., 3 Cir., 1947, 161 F.2d 534, at page 535, certiorari denied 332 U.S. 762, 68 S.Ct. 65, 92 L.Ed. 348; Carpenter v. Erie R. Co., 3 Cir., 1942, 132 F.2d 362; and see United States v. Borin, 5 Cir., 1954, 209 F.2d 145, at pages 147, 148.18 Although there is respectable authority to the c......
  • Granfield v. Csx Transp. Inc
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • 12 de março de 2010
    ... ... Id. (citing Lilly v. Grand Trunk W.R. Co., ... 317 U.S. 481, 485, 63 S.Ct. 347, 87 L.Ed ... 411 (1943)). The ... limitations period); Carpenter v. Erie R ... Co., 132 F.2d 362, 362 (3d Cir.1942) (dismissing FELA ... ...
  • Frabutt v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis R. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • 25 de maio de 1949
    ...R. Co., 3 Cir., 161 F.2d 534; Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Burnette, 239 U.S. 199, 36 S.Ct. 75, 60 L.Ed. 226; Carpenter v. Erie R. Co., 3 Cir., 132 F.2d 362. There is no question that the Federal Employers' Liability Act created a cause of action unknown to the common law. The statute of l......
  • Osbourne v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • 5 de dezembro de 1947
    ...239 U.S. 199, 36 S.Ct. 75, 60 L.Ed. 226; Phillips Co. v. Grand Trunk Ry., 236 U.S. 662, 35 S.Ct. 444, 59 L.Ed. 774; Carpenter v. Erie Ry., 3 Cir., 132 F.2d 362; Pollen v. Ford Instrument Co., 2 Cir., 108 F.2d 762; Bell v. Wabash R. Co., 8 Cir., 58 F.2d 569. 3 Engel v. Davenport, 271 U.S. 33......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT