Carrasco v. Astrue

Decision Date26 August 2013
PartiesYOLANDA CARRASCO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
CourtU.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

The plaintiff, Yolanda Carrasco, seeks review of the final decision of the Commissioner ("Commissioner") of the Social Security Administration ("Agency") denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits ("DIB") under Title II, Sections 216(i) and 223(d) of the Social Security Act ("Act"), and for Supplemental Security Income ("SSI") under Title XVI, Section 1614(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Ms. Carrasco asks the court to reverse and remand the Commissioner's decision, while the Commissioner seeks an order affirming the decision.

I.PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Ms. Carrasco filed concurrent applications for DIB and SSI on December 3, 2008, alleging she had been disabled since November 15, 2008, due to severe impairments of ligament tear and mild degenerative osteoarthritis right knee; mild degenerative change, left shoulder; degenerative disc disease with radiculopathy, cervical spine; chronic lower back pain; and obesity. (Tr. 15). In addition to these impairments, the plaintiff's record presents that she is seeking treatment for a fracture of the right ring finger, abdominal pain, diabetes mellitus type 1, depression, and hypertension. Both of her claims were initially denied on March 3, 2009, and upon reconsiderationon June 16, 2009. (Tr. 13). Thereafter, Ms. Carrasco filed a written request for hearing on August 11, 2009 (20 CFR §§ 404.929 et seq. and 416.1429 et seq.). The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) convened a hearing held on July 13, 2010, at which Ms. Carrasco, represented by counsel, appeared and testified. (Tr. 29-51). In addition, Ms. Amy Mowery testified as a vocational expert. (Tr. 47-51). On October 19, 2010, the ALJ issued a decision, denying Ms. Carrasco's application for DIB and SSI. (Tr. 13-24). The ALJ found that Ms. Carrasco was not under a "disability" within the meaning of the Social Security Act, at any time through the date of the decision, because she has the residual functional capacity to perform sedentary work as defined in 20 CFR 404.1567(a) and 416.967(a) with limitations, of which there exist a significant number of jobs in the national economy, including her past relevant work as a telemarketer. (Tr. 13-24). This became the final decision of the Commissioner when the Appeals Council denied Ms. Carrasco's request for review on December 16, 2011. (Tr. 1-4).

Plaintiff seeks judicial review of the Commissioner's denial of her claims. The federal district court has jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c). Both parties consented in writing to proceed before a Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

II.THE EVIDENCE OF RECORD
A.The Vocational Evidence

Ms. Carrasco was born on April 3, 1963, making her forty-seven years old at the time of the ALJ's decision. (Tr. 23). She is single, and has one child who is seventeen years old. (Tr. 33). She lives in a house with her child and sister. (Tr. 33). She is 5' 2" tall and weighs 225-pounds. (Tr. 33). The plaintiff has a high school education and her past relevant work was a telemarketer. (Tr. 22).She also received, but did not complete, specialized training as a certified nurse's assistant. (Tr. 33). Ms. Carrasco explained that she lost her job as telemarketer on November 15, 2008 because she "[was not] producing." (Tr. 34). At the time of her hearing, Ms. Carrasco was not employed.

B.The Medical Evidence

In her nine-page memorandum in support of her motion for summary judgment, Ms. Carrasco bases her claim that she is entitled to DIB on her inability to use her left dominant upper extremity, cervical pain, and pain and numbness in her left hand, left arm, left shoulder, and neck. She cites to various pieces of medical evidence to support her position: diagnostic test results including MRI reports of her right knee, cervical spine and left shoulder, an EMG examination, X-ray examination results, and reports from several physicians who treated her. She contends that this evidence proves that the ALJ erred when he failed to find that she was disabled.

On August 31, 2007, Ms. Carrasco visited Dr. Pervez Rasul and was diagnosed with diabetes mellitus. (Tr. 294). In the ophthalmological report, Dr. Rasul reported that Ms. Carrasco's function or employability would be markedly improved by treatment or appliance, and specified that she needed reading glasses. (Tr. 296). In addition, Dr. Rasul reported that Ms. Carrasco has the ability to ambulate safely, drive safely, perform activities that require good eye/hand coordination, and perform activities that require good distant, detailed vision. (Tr. 297).

On February 8, 2008, Ms. Carrasco visited Berwyn Magnetic Resonance Center and had her right knee examined by Dr. Joyce Tarbet. Dr. Tarbet reported that there is intrinsic degenerative signal within the anterior horn of the medial meniscus, but that no definite tear is identified. (Tr. 414). Moreover, Dr. Tarbet's report noted that there is absence of a normal appearing cruciateligament and tricompartmental arthritic changes. (Tr. 414). Dr. Tarbet reported that no full-thickness cartilaginous defects nor bone contusions are identified. (Tr. 414).

On October 28, 2008, Ms. Carrasco went to see Dr. Manish Desai for a flu visit. Dr. Desai found that Ms. Carrasco was experiencing level 10/10 pain in her right knee and level 5/10 pain in her back. (Tr. 283). Dr. Desai also noted that Ms. Carrasco's eyes were worsening and that she had blurriness of vision. (Tr. 283).

In December of 2008, Dr. Tarbet indicated to Dr. Desai that Ms. Carrasco has early degenerative arthritis of her right knee. (Tr. 403).

On February 13, 2009, Ms. Carrasco visited a State agency physician who conducted an X-ray examination on her right knee and lumbar spine. (Tr. 312). Dr. Eugene Kovalsky's X-ray interpretation noted that there is no evidence of fracture in the right knee. (Tr. 313). Dr. Kovalsky reported that a slight degree of narrowing at the medial joint compartment with mild sclerosis at the articulating surfaces can be noted and concluded that Ms. Carrasco had mild degenerative arthritis. (Tr. 313). Dr. Kovalsky stated that the study of Ms. Carrasco's right knee was otherwise normal. (Tr. 313). In interpreting the lumbosacral spine examination, Dr. Kovalsky reported that the study shows normal vertebral bodies in correct alignment; the intervertebral spaces are well maintained with well defined articulating surfaces; and the posterior spinal elements and facet joints are normal. (Tr. 313).

On the same date, Dr. James A. Runke performed the Internal Medicine Consultative Examination for the Bureau of Disability Determination Services after obtaining and reviewing Ms. Carrasco's medical records and history. Results from this physical examination revealed that Ms. Carrasco has evidence of hyper-lordosis of the lumbar spine and associated tenderness to palpationwith bilateral paravertebral muscle spasm in the lower lumbar spine region. (Tr. 317). Moreover, Dr. Runke noted that Ms. Carrasco has tenderness over the medial and lateral joint lies of both knees. (Tr. 317). Dr. Runke added that there is decreased range of motion with pain at the lumbar spine and both knees, and that significant palpable crepitations are appreciated with active and passive range of motion at both knees, more severe on the right than on the left. (Tr. 318). Dr. Runke noted four problems in the clinical impression section of his report: obesity, knee and back arthralgias consistent with degenerative joint disease, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. (Tr. 319). Additionally, Dr. Runke reported that Ms. Carrasco was observed ambulating "slowly and gingerly with each lower extremity taking very, very small steps with each forward movement." (Tr. 317-318).

Dr. Virgilio Pilapil completed a residual functional capacity ("RFC") form on March 2, 2009. Dr. Pilapil opined that Ms. Carrasco could only occasionally lift 20 pounds, stand or walk for a total of at least two hours and sit for a total of about 6 hours in an eight hour work day. (Tr. 328). Dr. Pilapil also noted that Ms. Carrasco was limited in pushing and pulling in her lower extremities. (Tr. 328).

A CT examination of Ms. Carrasco's abdomen and pelvis dated March 6, 2009 revealed that a thickening of part of the right minor fissure, but no acute abnormality of the lung bases. (Tr. 392). Dr. David Moon reported here that there is no hydronephrosis. (Tr. 392).

On May 6, 2009, Ms. Carrasco had her cervical spine and left shoulder examined. The cervical spine MRI indicates C5-6 left paracentral disc-osteophyte protrusion which severely narrows the left paracentral region of the spinal canal (Tr. 354). The report also adds that degenerative changes of the remainder of the cervical spine are mild. (Tr. 356). The left shoulderMRI notes that there are mild degenerative changes of the acromioclavicular joint, and also noted a 1.6 x 1.6 cm left axillary lymph node. (Tr. 356).

Ms. Carrasco also had her left elbow examined on June 6, 2009. The result of the MRI noted that there was no grossly abnormal mass of the left elbow. (Tr. 410).

An EMG report by Dr. Tarbet dated August 6, 2009 reveals left C6 radiculopathy with acute and subacute denervation changes. (Tr. 395). Moreover, Doctor Tarbet commented that the EMG changes correspond to the duration of Ms. Carrasco's symptoms. (Tr. 395).

C.The Administrative Hearing Testimony
1.Ms. Carrasco's Testimony

At her hearing, Ms. Carrasco testified that she suffered from pain in her back, right leg, left shoulder, and left hand. (Tr. 35). Because she was experiencing so much pain in her back and leg, she tried to receive therapy and treatment, but she stated that there was nothing that could be done because her pain was "so...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT