Carroll v. Celebrezze

Decision Date10 April 1964
Docket NumberCiv. No. 991.
Citation228 F. Supp. 24
PartiesDonald T. CARROLL, Social Security Account No. XXX-XX-XXXX, Plaintiff, v. Anthony J. CELEBREZZE, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, Defendant.
CourtU.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa

McMANUS, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the court on the petition of William T. Connery, counsel for plaintiff, filed March 12, 1964, seeking the court's approval of a fee of $1,300.00 for representing plaintiff.

On June 13, 1963, petitioner obtained an order from this court remanding the case for rehearing before the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, whereupon plaintiff, Donald T. Carroll, was awarded $3,944.00. It would appear that the Secretary does not have jurisdiction to fix the fee charged by an attorney for representing his client in judicial proceedings to review the Secretary's decision. Sheppard v. Flemming, 189 F.Supp. 571 (1960); 42 U.S. C.A. § 406. This court has been unable to find either statutory or regulatory authority giving it jurisdiction to determine the attorney's fee on judicial review. It is the court's view that determination of the fee is a matter of agreement between the attorney and his client.

For the foregoing reasons, it is

Ordered

That the petition, filed March 12, 1964, is dismissed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Webb v. Richardson
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • 20 Diciembre 1972
    ...fees for representation of a claimant before a court. See, e. g., Gonzalez v. Hobby, 213 F.2d 68, 69 (1st Cir. 1954); Carroll v. Celebrezze, 228 F.Supp. 24 (N.D.Iowa 1964); Sheppard v. Flemming, supra, 189 F.Supp. at 572. It was also settled that the Secretary's determination of the size of......
  • Guido v. Schweiker, 85-3110
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • 21 Octubre 1985
    ...to an award of fees only for administrative representation. See, e.g., Gonzalez v. Hobby, 213 F.2d 68 (1st Cir.1954); Carroll v. Celebrezze, 228 F.Supp. 24 (N.D.Iowa 1964); Sheppard v. Flemming, 189 F.Supp. 571 (S.D.W.Va.1960). Had Congress disagreed with that line of cases, it could have m......
  • Robinson v. Celebrezze, Civ. A. No. 4346.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina
    • 10 Septiembre 1965
    ...usual or appropriate. And it is so ordered. 1 See Perry v. Celebrezze, 236 F.Supp. 1, 2, N. 1 (E.D.S.C.1965). 2 See also Carroll v. Celebrezze, D.C., 228 F.Supp. 24. 3 238 F.Supp. ...
  • Castille v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE, 10039.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Louisiana
    • 9 Febrero 1965
    ...trial court exercising its full and complete jurisdiction in reviewing an appeal from the Secretary's decision. In Carroll v. Celebrezze, 228 F.Supp. 24 (N.D.Iowa 1964), the Court reached similar conclusions and held that the Secretary did not have jurisdiction to fix the fee charged by an ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT