Carroll v. State
Decision Date | 28 September 2001 |
Parties | Taurus CARROLL v. STATE of Alabama. |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
Joe W. Morgan III, Birmingham; and Joe W. Morgan, Jr., Birmingham (withdrew on 10/19/2000).
William H. Pryor, Jr., atty. gen., and A. Vernon Barnett IV, asst. atty. gen., for appellee.
On Return to Remand
Taurus Carroll was convicted of murder made capital because it was committed during the course of a robbery in the first degree. See § 13A-5-40(a)(2), Ala.Code 1975. The trial court overrode the jury's recommendation that Carroll be sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole and sentenced Carroll to death.
On August 27, 1999, this Court affirmed Carroll's conviction. Carroll v. State, 852 So.2d 801 (Ala.Crim.App.1999). However, we held that "the trial court erred in using Carroll's prior youthful offender adjudications to negate the existence of the statutory mitigating circumstance of `no significant history of prior criminal activity,'" and we remanded Carroll's case to the circuit court "with directions that that court make new findings as to the aggravating and mitigating circumstances in Carroll's case and reevaluate Carroll's sentence in light of this opinion." 852 So.2d at 816. On September 29, 1999, the circuit court, on its return to our remand order, submitted an amended sentencing order. In that order it reweighed the aggravating and mitigating circumstances and again overrode the jury's recommendation of life imprisonment without parole and sentenced Carroll to death. On November 19, 1999, this Court determined that the circuit court's finding that the statutory mitigating circumstance of "no significant history of prior criminal activity" existed in Carroll's case satisfied the statutory requirements and that the imposition of the death penalty was appropriate, and we affirmed Carroll's sentence. Carroll v. State, 852 So.2d at 818 (Ala.Crim.App. 1999).
Carroll petitioned the Alabama Supreme Court for certiorari review. The Supreme Court granted his petition, pursuant to Rule 39(c), Ala.R.App.P., as it read before an amendment effective May 19, 2000.2 On April 20, 2001, the Supreme Court affirmed Carroll's conviction, but remanded the case to this Court, holding that the trial court had failed to state specific reasons for failing to accept the jury's recommendation of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, as mandated by Ex parte Taylor, 808 So.2d 1215, 1220 (Ala. 2001). That court stated:
Ex parte Carroll, 852 So.2d 821, 828 (Ala. 2001).
On August 13, 2001, the circuit court, on its return to the remand order, submitted an amended sentencing order in which it weighed the aggravating circumstances and the mitigating circumstances; it again overrode the jury's recommendation of life imprisonment without parole and sentenced Carroll to death. The court's order stated, in pertinent part:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gavin v. State
...801 (Ala.Crim.App.1999), aff'd in pertinent part, remanded on other grounds, 852 So.2d 821 (Ala.2001), on return to remand, 852 So.2d 830 (Ala.Crim.App.2001), rev'd on other grounds, 852 So.2d 833 (Ala.2002), and the cases cited therein. Although Gavin introduced evidence indicating that th......
-
Minor v. State
...809 (Ala.Crim.App.1999), aff'd in pertinent part, remanded on other grounds, 852 So.2d 821 (Ala.2001), on return to remand, 852 So.2d 830 (Ala.Crim.App.2001), rev'd, 852 So.2d 833 "The question of whether a confession was voluntary is initially to be determined by the trial court." Jackson ......
-
Ex parte Carroll
...trial court's reasons for overriding the jury's recommendation were sufficient to comply with Ex parte Taylor. Carroll v. State, 852 So.2d 830 (Ala.Crim.App.2001)("Carroll IV"). This Court granted certiorari review; thus, the case is now before us for the second time. For a detailed account......