Carroll v. United States
| Docket Number | 10-1152 |
| Decision Date | 31 October 2011 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
102 cases
-
Thakkar v. United States
...and exhibits submitted.’ " Merlonghi , 620 F.3d at 54 (quoting Aversa v. U.S. , 99 F.3d 1200, 1210 (1st Cir. 1996) ); Carroll v. U.S. , 661 F.3d 87, 94 (1st Cir. 2011). That being said, a plaintiff cannot assert a proper jurisdictional basis "merely on ‘unsupported conclusions or interpreta......
-
Davis v. State
...329 (3d Cir. 2012).41 See, Wood v. U.S., 845 F.3d 123 (4th Cir. 2017) ; Tsolmon v. U.S., 841 F.3d 378 (5th Cir. 2016) ; Carroll v. U.S., 661 F.3d 87 (1st Cir. 2011) ; Garcia v. U.S. Air Force, 533 F.3d 1170 (10th Cir. 2008) ; OSI, Inc. v. U.S., 285 F.3d 947 (11th Cir. 2002).42 Northern Ins.......
-
Get in Shape Franchise, Inc. v. TFL Fishers, LLC
...been submitted, such as the depositions and exhibits.” Id.(internal quotation marks and citations omitted); see alsoCarroll v. United States, 661 F.3d 87, 94 (1st Cir.2011) (“In evaluating a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, we construe plaintiff......
-
De Baca v. United States
...recognized that an agency's choice of contractor is grounded on policy choices. See Ohlsen Motion at 23 (citing Carroll v. United States, 661 F.3d 87, 100 (1st Cir. 2011) ; Layton v. United States, 984 F.2d 1496, 1501-02 (8th Cir. 1993) ; Guile v. United States, 422 F.3d 221, 231 (5th Cir. ......
Get Started for Free