Carroll v. Wilkerson

Decision Date12 March 1986
Docket NumberNos. 84-1291,84-1292,s. 84-1291
Citation782 F.2d 44
PartiesTimothy CARROLL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank WILKERSON and William Lucas (84-1291), County of Wayne (84-1292), Defendants-Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit

Julie H. Hurwitz (argued), Deborah LaBelle (argued), Detroit, Mich., for plaintiff-appellant.

Richard Kudla, John D. O'Hair, Glen H. Downs (argued), Detroit, Mich., for defendants-appellees.

Before LIVELY, Chief Judge, WELLFORD, Circuit Judge, and PORTER, District Judge. *

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, who claimed to have been assaulted and raped by other inmates while in the Wayne County Jail for violating probation, brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 against the Wayne County sheriff and the administrator of the Wayne County Jail, and against the County. The district court dismissed the claims against the sheriff and jail administrator upon finding that they were barred by the applicable state statute of limitations. Subsequently, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of the County upon finding that the sheriff and the sheriff's administrative staff, rather than the County, were responsible for the operation of the jail and that after their dismissal from the case there was no viable defendant. The plaintiff appealed both orders, and the two appeals were consolidated by this court.

There have been several significant decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States and by this court since the district court entered its orders in this case. In Wilson v. Garcia, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 1938, 85 L.Ed.2d 254 (1985), the Supreme Court determined that all section 1983 claims should be characterized in the same way for limitations purposes and that such claims are best characterized as personal injury actions. In Garcia the Supreme Court then decided that the applicable state statute of limitations which applied generally to personal injury actions was the proper one to be applied in that section 1983 case. In Mulligan v. Hazard, 777 F.2d 340, (6th Cir.1985), this court determined that Wilson v. Garcia should be applied retroactively. If the district court had had the benefit of the decisions in Wilson v. Garcia and Mulligan v. Hazard it would have been compelled to conclude that the present section 1983 action was subject to the three-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims set forth in MCLA Sec. 600.5805(8). Accordingly, the orders dismissing the claims against Wilkerson and Lucas must be vacated and the case remanded for further proceedings with respect to those claims.

With respect to the claim against Wayne County, it appears that a decision of this court rendered after the decision of the district court undercuts the reasoning of the district court in dismissing the claims against the County. In Marchese v....

To continue reading

Request your trial
359 cases
  • Harris v. BD. OF EDUC. OF COLUMBUS, OHIO
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Ohio
    • June 26, 1992
    ...claims as opposed to two different, more specific statutes of limitations applicable to personal injuries. See Carroll v. Wilkerson, 782 F.2d 44 (6th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied sub nom. Wayne v. Carroll, 479 U.S. 923, 107 S.Ct. 330, 93 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986). In an en banc case, Browning ......
  • Rushing v. Wayne County
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • September 20, 1990
    ...is so close as to make the County liable for the Sheriff's failure to train and discipline his officers...." See Carroll v. Wilkerson, 782 F.2d 44 (CA 6, 1986), cert. den. 479 U.S. 923, 107 S.Ct. 330, 93 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986). Thus, the conclusions of the trial court and the Court of Appeals t......
  • Smith v. Heyns
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Michigan
    • October 16, 2013
    ...filed in Michigan under § 1983, the statute of limitations is three years. See MICH. COMP. LAWS § 600.5805(10); Carroll v. Wilkerson, 782 F.2d 44, 44 (6th Cir. 1986) (per curiam); Stafford v. Vaughn, No. 97-2239, 1999 WL 96990, at *1 (6th Cir. Feb. 2, 1999). Accrual of the claim for relief,......
  • Hirmuz v. City of Madison Heights
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Michigan
    • January 3, 2007
    ...in all section 1983 actions is the state statute of limitations governing actions for personal injury. Subsequently, in Carroll v. Wilkerson, 782 F.2d 44, 45 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 923, 107 S.Ct. 330, 93 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986), this court held that Michigan's three year statute of l......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT