Carson v. American Smelting & Refining Co.
Decision Date | 18 February 1928 |
Docket Number | No. 144.,144. |
Citation | 25 F.2d 116 |
Court | U.S. District Court — Western District of Washington |
Parties | CARSON et al. v. AMERICAN SMELTING & REFINING CO. (substituted for American Smelters' Securites Co.). |
John H. Miller, of San Francisco, Cal., Raymond Ives Blakeslee, of Los Angeles, Cal., and Lewis P. Shackleford, of Tacoma, Wash., for plaintiffs.
Charles Earl, of New York City, George Donworth and Donworth, Todd & Holman, all of Seattle, Wash., and A. F. Mecklenburger, Arthur A. Olson and Jones, Addington, Ames & Seibold, all of Chicago, Ill., for defendant.
In response to an order of the master in chancery to file a detailed statement of account in form of debtor and creditor under equity rules 62and63, showing profits accrued to the defendant from the patent infringement, the defendant filed a statement purporting to show expenses by use of infringing furnaces in its several plants and expenses in use of four other types of furnaces which, it claims, were open to defendant's use and each capable of producing the same result, and which, it asserted, are proper standards of comparison, showing gain by saving from the use of the invention, if any.The statement (side-charging patent in suit) and the statement of one of the four types of center-charged furnaces, follow:
To continue reading
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Davilla v. Brunswick-Balke Collender Co.
...are defined by the answer to the master's summons and the exceptions thereto, which take the place of pleadings. See Carson v. Amer. Smelting & Ref. Co., D.C., 25 F.2d 116; Wayne Mfg. Co. v. Coffield Motor Washer Co., 8 Cir., 255 F. 558; Armstrong v. Belding Bros. & Co., D.C., 280 F. 895, 8......