Carssow v. Brinton

Decision Date27 July 1922
Citation35 Idaho 667,208 P. 1031
PartiesO. C. CARSSOW, A. E. CARSSOW and PAUL W. JOHNSON, Appellants, v. CALEB BRINTON, Respondent
CourtIdaho Supreme Court

DEEDS-IMPLIED COVENANT AGAINST ENCUMBRANCES FROM THE USE OF THE WORD "GRANT"-COVENANT IMPLIED FROM THE USE OF THE WORD "GRANT" RUNS WITH THE LAND.

1. Under C. S., sec. 5384, the word "grant" in a deed of conveyance implies a covenant against the encumbrance of a tax lien which attaches during the ownership of the grantor and such implied covenant runs with the land.

2. A remote grantee may maintain an action against a prior grantor for the amount paid to remove a tax lien from the premises which attached during the ownership of such prior grantor.

APPEAL from the District Court of the Tenth Judicial District, for Nez Perce County. Hon. Wallace N. Scales, Judge.

Action to recover taxes paid on covenant implied from the use of the word "grant" in a deed of conveyance. Demurrer to complaint sustained. Reversed.

Judgment reversed, with costs to appellants.

Eugene A. Cox and Noe B. Martin, for Appellants.

Benjamin F. Tweedy, for Respondent.

See authorities cited by same counsel in Brinton v. Johnson ante, p. 656.

RICE C. J. Budge, McCarthy, Dunn and Lee, JJ., concur.

OPINION

RICE, C. J.

This action was commenced by appellants to recover from respondent money paid for taxes upon certain real estate in the city of Lewiston. Respondent was the owner of the land on the second Monday of January, 1919, and thereafter until August 28, 1919, when he conveyed the premises by warranty deed to Auguste Johnson and J. A. Johnson, her husband. The words of conveyance in the deed included the word "grant." On August 29, 1919, Auguste Johnson and J. A. Johnson conveyed the premises by warranty deed to appellants. Appellants demanded of respondent that he pay the taxes for the year 1919, which he declined to do. They thereupon paid the taxes and brought this action for the recovery of the amount paid. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and the action dismissed.

In the case of Brinton v. Johnson et al., ante, p 656, 208 P. 1028, it was held that the word "grant" in a deed of conveyance implies a covenant against an encumbrance of a tax lien "done, made or suffered" by the grantor which runs with the land. The taxes assessed and levied for the year 1919 became a lien as of the second Monday of January, while respondent was the owner of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Brinton v. Johnson
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • October 27, 1925
    ...to be effective, it must be explicitly restrained by express words in the conveyance. (C. S., sec. 5384; Brinton v. Johnson, supra; Carssow v. Brinton, supra; Allen Kitchen, supra.) WILLIAM A. LEE, C. J. Wm. E. Lee, Budge, Givens and Taylor, JJ., concur. OPINION WILLIAM A. LEE, C. J. This i......
  • Brinton v. Johnson
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • July 27, 1922
    ...208 P. 1028 35 Idaho 656 CALEB BRINTON, Respondent, v. AUGUSTE JOHNSON, J. A. JOHNSON (Her Husband), O. C. CARSSOW, A. E. CARSSOW, MARY E. CARSSOW (His Wife), PAUL W. JOHNSON and LAURA B. JOHNSON (His Wife), Appellants Supreme Court of IdahoJuly 27, 1922 ... COVENANTS ... IMPLIED FROM THE USE OF THE WORD "GRANT" IN A DEED ... OF CONVEYANCE-TAX LIENS AS ENCUMBRANCES-IMPLIED COVENANTS ... AGAINST ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT