Carter v. Landel/Arundel, Inc.
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | QUILLIAN |
| Citation | Carter v. Landel/Arundel, Inc., 322 S.E.2d 108, 172 Ga.App. 115 (Ga. App. 1984) |
| Decision Date | 14 September 1984 |
| Docket Number | 68519 and 68626,Nos. 68518,s. 68518 |
| Parties | CARTER et al. v. LANDEL/ARUNDEL, INC. et al. CARTER et al. v. VIAN et al. CARTER et al. v. LANDEL/ARUNDEL, INC. |
David L. Carter, Kitty L. Carter, pro se.
John T. Vian, for appellees (case nos. 68518, 68519).
E. Kendrick Smith, Atlanta, for appellee (case nos. 68518, 68519 and 68626).
These three appeals involve the same parties and concern attempts by the appellants to prevent appellees from obtaining possession of certain property. Held:
1. In 68518 appeal was taken from an order denying the appellants' motion for a temporary restraining order and a stay of proceedings by the appellee to foreclose on the property. The foreclosure has already occurred and this appeal is moot.
2. In 68519 appeal was taken from an order granting the appellants' temporary restraining order provided certain conditions were met, including that appellants pay $6,500 into the registry of the court. The conditions were not met and the foreclosure proceeded as was recited above. The issues in this appeal are likewise moot.
3. After foreclosure, the appellee brought a dispossessory action against the appellants. Thereafter, appellants answered, and appellee filed a motion under OCGA § 44-7-54 that appellants be required to pay rent and expenses into the registry of the court. The trial judge granted the motion, ordering the payment of rent into the registry of the court. This appeal (68626) was taken from that order.
The merits of the dispossessory proceeding still remain for determination. Thus, the requirements of an application for appeal under OCGA § 5-6-34(b) must be followed, in the absence of which the appeal is premature and subject to dismissal. Johnson v. Gwinnett County Bank, 156 Ga.App. 597, 275 S.E.2d 157; Grantham v. Nelson, 160 Ga.App. 68, 286 S.E.2d 59.
Appeals dismissed in 68518, 68519 and 68626.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
- Hadaway v. Cooner Enterprises, Inc.
- Huntley Jiffy Stores, Inc. v. Grigsby
-
Hospital Authority of Ben Hill County v. Bostic
... ... Gyles, Inc. v. Turner, 184 Ga.App. 376, 377, 361 S.E.2d 538 (1987). "[T]he basis for an owner's liability for ... ...
-
Owens v. Green Tree Servicing LLC
...the trial court's ruling ordering Owens to pay rent pending appeal, if he wished to remain in possession of the premises. Citing Carter v. Landel/Arundel, Inc.10 and Wall v. T.J.B. Svcs.,11 Green Tree claims that Owens was required to file an interlocutory application to have this appeal he......
-
Appellate Practice and Procedure - Roland F. L. Hall
...using the applicable 4. Id. at 23-24, 684 S.E.2d at 100-01. 5. Id. at 24, 684 S.E.2d at 101. 6. Carter v. Landel/Arundel, Inc., 172 Ga. App. 115, 322 S.E.2d 108 (1984); Wall v. T.J.B. Servs., Inc., 141 Ga. App. 437, 233 S.E.2d 810 (1977). 7. Owens, 300 Ga. App. at 24, 684 S.E.2d at 101. 8. ......