Carter v. State, FF-147

Decision Date15 March 1978
Docket NumberNo. FF-147,FF-147
Citation356 So.2d 67
PartiesNathaniel CARTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Robert H. Wilson, III and James D. Swearingen of Harrell, Wiltshire, Stone & Swearingen, Pensacola, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from the judgment of the Circuit Court, Escambia County, entered on a jury verdict, finding the Defendant guilty of robbery. The conviction must be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial due to the conduct of the prosecuting attorney in the course of his closing argument to the jury.

The prosecuting attorney in closing argument told the jury that Defendant's attorney was trying to "distort the evidence" and then stated:

"MR. RON JOHNSON: She's trying to mislead you. That's her job. She's been appointed to be the defendant's mouthpiece, and she's done it. But, remember that when you return to the jury room.

It's almost criminal sometimes the extent these people go to

MRS. PTOMEY: (Interposing) I object, Your Honor.

MR. JOHNSON: To represent these criminals.

JUDGE: Young man.

MR. JOHNSON: Yes, Your Honor.

JUDGE: You're not to reply to counsel.

MR. JOHNSON: I'm sorry, Your Honor."

(At this point the jury was excused for conference on Defendant's motion for a mistrial, and the following occurred.)

"JUDGE: It's improper. You can't comment on her morals and her actions.

MR. JOHNSON: Your Honor, I'm not commenting

JUDGE: (Interposing) You said, 'It's almost criminal sometimes the extent these people go to to defend these criminals.'

MR. JOHNSON: But I'm not accusing her of anything. I said, 'almost'; I'm not saying that she is.

JUDGE: Are you saying she's almost a criminal?

MR. JOHNSON: I'm saying it's almost criminal the extent sometimes these people go to.

JUDGE: I deny the motion for a mistrial, but I'm going to instruct the State Attorney to apologize and to explain to the jury that he didn't mean that the defense counsel was criminal or almost criminal.

MR. JOHNSON: You want me to apologize to Mrs. Ptomey, to the jury

JUDGE: (Interposing) Yes.

MR. JOHNSON: And explain to them what I meant by the argument?

JUDGE: I want to make sure the jury hears that you're not accusing her of any criminal act or almost criminal act in representing a criminal.

MR. JOHNSON: Gentlemen and Mrs. Stattem of the jury, His Honor has instructed me I shouldn't have been quite so rough with the young lady. I apologize to you

MRS. PTOMEY: (Interposing) I object.

MR. JOHNSON: And I apologize to the lady

JUDGE: (Interposing) That's all right. Go ahead. The objection is...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Wackenhut Corp. v. Canty
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • April 4, 1978
    ...352 So.2d 125, 126 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977) (prosecutor's reference to "one of the favorite tricks of a defense lawyer"); Carter v. State, 356 So.2d 67 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978) (prosecutor's argument that "(s)he's been appointed to be the defendant's mouthpiece . . . . It's almost criminal sometimes ......
  • Peterson v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 5, 1979
    ...personal reference to the defendant and to his attorney as well was perhaps the most offensive remark of all. See Carter v. State, 356 So.2d 67 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); cf. Johnson v. State, 351 So.2d 10 Before this Court, the State, as it could not, makes no real defense of the prosecutor's ar......
  • Jackson v. State, 81-1729
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 5, 1982
    ...as is now acknowledged by the state, utterly and grossly improper. 1 Adams v. State, 192 So.2d 762 (Fla.1966); Carter v. State, 356 So.2d 67 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Reed v. State, 333 So.2d 524 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); see Peterson v. State, 376 So.2d 1230, 1233 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). While the prej......
  • Gallon v. State, 82-1622
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 9, 1984
    ...talked with her"); Jackson v. State, 421 So.2d 15 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) ("would you buy a used car from this guy?"); Carter v. State, 356 So.2d 67 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978) ("it's almost criminal sometimes the extent these people go ... to represent these criminals"); Simpson v. State, 352 So.2d 125......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Pre-trial discovery and motion practice
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Innovative DUI Trial Tools
    • May 1, 2021
    ...jury. State v. Lundbom , 96 Or. App. 458, 773 P.2d 11 (1989) (referring to defense counsel as “pimp” and “hired gun”); Carter v. State , 356 So. 2d 67 (Fla. App. 1978) (prosecutor referred to defense counsel as a “mouthpiece”); Commonwealth v. Long , 392 A.2d 810, 813 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1978) ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT