Case Intern. Co. v. T.L. James and Co., Inc., 89-2478
| Decision Date | 28 June 1990 |
| Docket Number | No. 89-2478,89-2478 |
| Citation | 907 F.2d 65 |
| Parties | CASE INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, Appellee, v. T.L. JAMES AND COMPANY, INC., Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
John Dewey Watson, Little Rock, Ark., for appellant.
Peter G. Kumpe, Little Rock, Ark., for appellee.
Before JOHN R. GIBSON and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges, and HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge.
T.L. James and Company, Inc. (James), a Louisiana corporation, contracted with the State Highway and Transportation Department of Arkansas to construct a bridge spanning the Red River between Miller and Lafayette counties. Case International Company (Case), an Illinois corporation, entered into a subcontract with James to install the bridge's foundation. Changes to and delays in the project forced Case to incur substantial costs in addition to those expenses contracted for. Case sued James under the District Court's 1 diversity jurisdiction for recovery in quantum meruit for the reasonable value of the additional services or, in the alternative, for compensatory damages on claims for breach of contract and breach of warranty.
James moved the court to compel arbitration of the matter pursuant to the arbitration clause in its contract with the state. James argued that the clause was incorporated by reference into the subcontract with Case by operation of a "flow-through" clause in the subcontract. Case disagreed and maintained that it was entitled to its day in court. After a hearing, the District Court held that the arbitration clause in the general contract was not incorporated by reference into the subcontract and denied James's motion to compel arbitration. 2 James appeals. 3
A district court's interpretation of an unambiguous written contract is reviewed de novo. See Local 257, Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers v. Grimm, 786 F.2d 342, 345 (8th Cir.1986). Here, however, the contract is not unambiguous and the court held a hearing and heard testimony on the parties' intent. The District Court's decision that the arbitration clause was not incorporated by reference into the subcontract thus is a finding of fact, subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review on appeal. See Ford v. First Mun. Leasing Corp., 838 F.2d 994, 997 (8th Cir.1988).
This dispute is subject to the enforcement provisions of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) because it involves a transaction in commerce. 9 U.S.C. Secs. 2, 4 (1988). As the District Court noted, although the FAA favors expanded arbitration coverage when there is a question regarding scope, arbitration will not be imposed upon a party unless that party has agreed to this settlement procedure. Volt Information Sciences v. Board of Trustees, 489 U.S. 468, ----, 109 S.Ct. 1248, 1254, 1255, 103 L.Ed.2d 488 (1989); Order at 4. Based on a careful reading of the arbitration clause in the general contract and the flow-through clause in the subcontract, and on the testimony of a retired engineer for the Arkansas Highway Department, who drafted the arbitration clause, regarding the department's intent, the court found there was no agreement to arbitrate. James has...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
George Washington University v. Scott
...that a party has waived its right to ordinary judicial process without an express and specific agreement." Case Int'l Co. v. T.L. James & Co., 907 F.2d 65, 67 (8th Cir.1990). As the trial court observed, the arbitration clause itself contained no indication whatsoever that its terms would a......
-
AgGrow Oils, L.L.C. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh
...When a contract is ambiguous, extrinsic evidence may be considered to determine the parties' intent. See Case Int'l Co. v. T.L. James & Co., 907 F.2d 65, 67 (8th Cir. 1990) (testimony of drafter considered in finding that prime contract's arbitration clause was not incorporated by reference......
-
Y & A Group Securities Litigation, In re
...(1981). Where contract language is unambiguous, the district court's interpretation is reviewed de novo. Case Int'l Co. v. T.L. James and Co., Inc., 907 F.2d 65, 66 (8th Cir.1990). But where the contract language is ambiguous, the intent of the parties will be a factual finding reviewed onl......
-
People v. Emerson
...had. The presence of cocaine in the privately opened bundles "spoke volumes as to [the] contents [of the remaining bundles]." (Id., 907 F2d at 65, quoting United States v Jacobsen, 466 US at 121, quoting Texas v Brown, 460 US 730, 743 [1983]; see also, People v Acosta, 198 AD2d 285 [2d Dept......
-
Lichtenberger, Sparks, and Wicks: the Future of the Private Search Doctrine
...United States v. Simpson, 904 F.2d 607, 610 (11th Cir. 1990).91. See, e.g., Oliver, 630 F.3d at 408; Donnes, 947 F.2d at 1439; Bowman, 907 F.2d at 65.92. See Donnes, 947 F.2d at 1439 (holding that "by removing the lens case from the glove, and then opening the lens case, the officer exceede......
-
Chapter 7 - § 7.3 • IS THE AGREEMENT TO ARBITRATE BINDING UPON THE PARTIES TO THE DISPUTE?
...(D.C. 2012).[55] Cecil's Inc. v. Morris Mech. Enters., Inc., 735 F.2d 437 (11th Cir. 1984).[56] Cf. Case Int'l Co. v. T.L. James & Co., 907 F.2d 65 (8th Cir. 1990). See Kvaerner ASA v. Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd., 210 F.3d 262, 265 (4th Cir. 2000). Compare MPACT Constr. Grp., LLC v. Supe......
-
Chapter 11 - § 11.14 • SUBCONTRACT CLAUSES: A CHECKLIST
...a subcontract can incorporate an arbitration clause by reference to the general contract). But see Case Int'l Co. v. T. L. James & Co., 907 F.2d 65, 67 (8th Cir. 1990) (holding that subcontract's flow-through clause never specifically indicated the subcontractor's and contractor's intention......
-
Chapter 21 - § 21.3 • ARBITRATION OF CONSTRUCTION DISPUTES
...at Inverness Residential Condo. Ass'n v. Metro. Homes, Inc., 395 P.3d 788 (Colo. 2017).[399] Cf. Case Int'l Co. v. T.L. James & Co., 907 F.2d 65 (8th Cir. 1990). See Kvaerner ASA v. Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd., 210 F.3d 262, 265 (4th Cir. 2000). Compare MPACT Constr. Grp., LLC v. Superio......