Case of Nardi
| Decision Date | 26 March 1982 |
| Docket Number | No. 81-059,81-059 |
| Citation | 444 A.2d 512,122 N.H. 277 |
| Parties | NARDI'S CASE. |
| Court | New Hampshire Supreme Court |
Sherman D. Horton, Jr., Nashua, as Chairman of the Committee on Professional Conduct.
Brown & Nixon P. A., Manchester (David L. Nixon, Manchester, orally), for respondent.
The question presented is the range of the discipline to be imposed upon Bernard V. Nardi, Jr.
The United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire convicted Mr. Nardi of conspiracy to commit certain bank robberies, of receipt of the proceeds of one of the bank robberies, and of being an accessory after the fact by assisting in the concealment of the proceeds of another robbery. United States v. Nardi, No. 78-00048-01 (D.N.H. July 16, 1979). Concurrent sentences of one-year's imprisonment were suspended, and probation for a period of three years from the date of the sentence was ordered. On appeal, the conviction was affirmed. United States v. Nardi, 633 F.2d 972, 978 (1980).
Mr. Nardi agreed to a voluntary suspension from the practice of law, and on August 2, 1979, this court suspended him pending further proceedings. On December 21, 1981, a hearing was held before a Referee (Ralph H. Wood, Esq.). During that hearing, the respondent urged the referee to recommend to the supreme court that we suspend him for a period commensurate with his criminal probationary period. The Chairman of the Committee on Professional Conduct, speaking on behalf of committee members, urged the referee to recommend an indefinite suspension. The referee recommended that the court suspend Mr. Nardi indefinitely and grant him leave to petition on or about August 2, 1984, for readmission to the practice of law. In oral argument before this court on February 22, 1982, the respondent and the chairman reiterated the positions which they had taken before the referee.
The supreme court is obligated to discipline a lawyer appropriately when the lawyer's conduct seriously deviates from professional norms. State v. Merski, 121 N.H. ----, ----, 437 A.2d 710, 714 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 943, 102 S.Ct. 1439, 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982); Barnard's Case, 101 N.H. 33, 34, 131 A.2d 630, 630-31 (1957). See generally ABA Problems and Recommendations in Disciplinary Enforcement, 12-14 (Preliminary Draft 1970). The purposes of disciplinary action are not to add to the punishment imposed by the criminal law, but to protect the public, to nurture public confidence in the bar, and to reaffirm the bar's fidelity to the high ethical standards that the public has a right to expect from members of the legal profession. State v. Merski, 121 N.H. at ----, 437 A.2d at 714; Harrington's Case, 100 N.H. 243, 244, 123 A.2d 396, 396 (1956); Lawyers, Clients, and Professional Regulation, 3 Am. B. Foundation Research Journal 919, 925 (1976).
During the past quarter of a century, this court has suspended lawyers guilty of committing federal internal revenue misdemeanors. E.g., Wholey's Case, 110 N.H. 449, 451, 270 A.2d 609, 610 (1970) (six-month suspension); Silverstein's Case, 108 N.H. 400, 402, 236 A.2d 488, 490 (1967) (three-month suspension); Ford's Case, 102 N.H 24, 26, 149 A.2d 863, 864 (1959) (two-month suspension). The court has also disbarred two lawyers who were each guilty of committing the felony of...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Carroll, In re
... ... We have considered the mitigating factors in this case, and we are cognizant of the respondent's efforts to rehabilitate himself. This court, however, "is obligated to discipline a lawyer appropriately hen the lawyer's conduct seriously deviates from professional norms (citations omitted)." Nardi's Case, 122 N.H. 277, 278, 444 A.2d 512, 513 (1982). As we stated in Broderick's Case, 106 N.H. 562, 215 A.2d 705 (1965), the purpose of ... ...
-
Eshleman's Case
... ... Clearly, this court is empowered to [126 N.H. 4] impose either sanction as necessary to protect the public and the integrity of the legal profession. RSA 311:8; Sup.Ct.R. 37(13)(f); see, e.g., Delano's Case, 58 N.H. 5 (1876); Nardi's Case, 122 N.H. 277, 278, 444 A.2d 512, 513-14 (1982) (attorney removed from office or disbarred); Wholey's Case, 110 N.H. 449, 270 A.2d 609 (1970) (attorney suspended for six months); Mussman's Case, 111 N.H. 402, 412, 286 A.2d 614, 620 (1971) (attorney suspended until further order of this ... ...
-
Bilodeau v. Antal
... ... We hold that the medical expert in this case may properly be excluded from acting as the plaintiffs' legal representative in order to prevent him from engaging in the unauthorized practice of ... Perhaps more important, lawyers are subject to discipline, Nardi's Case, 122 N.H. 277, 278, 444 A.2d 512, 513 (1982), and may be sued privately if their performance falls below the level of reasonable care and ... ...
-
Astles' Case
... ... He asks us to consider that his initial misconduct involved dishonesty with respect to a personal matter, and not dishonesty in his role as an [134 N.H. 606] attorney. Moreover, in an attempt to distinguish some of our prior disbarment cases, see Nardi's Case, 122 N.H. 277, 444 A.2d 512 (1982); St. Pierre's Case, 113 N.H. 198, 304 A.2d 88 (1973); Silverstein's Case, 108 N.H. 400, 236 A.2d 488 (1967), the respondent contends that his personal misconduct did not result in a criminal conviction. Finally, he argues that his misconduct before the ... ...