Case v. Crouse, 46541
Decision Date | 04 November 1972 |
Docket Number | No. 46541,46541 |
Citation | 502 P.2d 785,210 Kan. 341 |
Parties | Walter G. CASE, Jr., Appellant, v. Sherman H. CROUSE, Warden, Kansas State Penitentiary, Appellee. |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
This is an appeal from an order of the district court summarily dismissing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by the appellant, Walter G. Case, Jr., an inmate of the Kansas State Penitentiary. The appellee is the warden of the penitentiary. The proceedings were filed pro se and are designated as a 'Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificondum Pursuant K.S.A. 60-1505 et seq. (60-1501).'
Appellant contends he has been mistreated during his confinement in the penal institution; that his mistreatment is of a continuing nature; that his rights have been denied; that there are substantial issues of fact to be determined, and that habeas corpus is a proper remedy.
The same questions were before this court in Levier v. State, 209 Kan. 442, 497 P.2d 265, and Hamrick v. Hazelet, 209 Kan. 383, 497 P.2d 273. The opinions and decisions in those cases control the decision in the present case. In Levier this court said:
(209 Kan. p. 452, 497 P.2d p. 273.)
Pursuant to our admonition in Levier, the director of penal institutions has adopted revised rules and regulations. The Kansas Penal System Policy, Guidelines, and Inmate Disciplinary Procedures were made effective August 1, 1972.
The judgment is...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Habeas Corpus Application of Pierpoint
...proceeding, available administrative remedies must be exhausted. Davis v. State, 211 Kan. 257, 505 P.2d 293 (1973); Case v. Crouse, 210 Kan. 341, 502 P.2d 785 (1972). They assert that the failure to exhaust administrative remedies also bars claims for declaratory and injunctive relief. Jarv......
-
Stanley v. Sullivan
...inmates to exhaust appropriate administrative remedies prior to seeking a writ of habeas corpus under K.S.A. 60–1501. See Case v. Crouse, 210 Kan. 341, 342, 502 P.2d 785 (1972) (requiring an inmate to exhaust administrative remedies under the grievance procedures adopted by the state direct......
-
Highman v. Marquez, 50523
...proceeding, available administrative remedies must be exhausted. Davis v. State, 211 Kan. 257, 505 P.2d 293 (1973); Case v. Crouse, 210 Kan. 341, 502 P.2d 785 (1972). Failure to exhaust administrative remedies also bars claims for declaratory and injunctive relief. Jarvis v. Kansas Commissi......
-
Davis v. State, 46889
...court in Levier v. State, 209 Kan. 442, 497 P.2d 265; Hamrick v. Hazelet, 209 Kan. 383, 497 P.2d 273; and more recently, in Case v. Crouse, 210 Kan. 341, 502 P.2d 785. In Levier, we suggested appropriate administrative procedures be established and the remedies required thereby be exhausted......