Case v. Kelly
Decision Date | 06 January 1890 |
Citation | 133 U.S. 21,10 S.Ct. 216,33 L.Ed. 513 |
Parties | CASE v. KELLY et al.% |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
The Green Bay & Minnesota Railroad Company being in the hands of a receiver, namely, Timothy Case, in the circuit court of the United States for the eastern district of Wisconsin, in a suit by the Farmers' Loan & Trust Company to foreclose a mortgage on said railroad, said receiver was directed by the court to take possession of all the property, real and personal, of said company, namely, its roadbed, lands, right of way, and all its other property and rights whatsoever, with authority to bring suits, in the name of the railroad company, as he should be advised by counsel to be necessary. Under this order, Mr. Case, as receiver, broght the present suit, stating that he sues in behalf of said railroad company, and as receiver, the defendants David M. Kelly, Henry Ketchum, and George Hiles, and the Arcadia Mineral Spring Company, a corporation created by the laws of the state of Wisconsin. The allegations of the bill are that the defendants Kelly Ketchum, and Hilles, who were officers of the railroad company during its period of construction, had procured numerous donations of land from citizens who were interested in the construction of the road, along its line, intended to be for the use and benefit of the railroad company, and to assist it in such construction. The fundamental allegation of the bill is that these defendants, representing to the persons who made the donations that they were officers of the road, and soliciting these grants for the benefit of the road, took the conveyances to themselves individually; that they did this in a fraudulent manner, by making the grantors in the conveyances believe that they, as the officers of the company, could receive the conveyances for the benefit of the road; and that either the grantors did not really know to whom the conveyances were made, or were induced to believe that when made the grantees held the lands as a trust for the benefit of the road. These defendants not recognizing this trust, and the conveyances on their faces being merely conveyances to the individuals, either separately or collectively, to-wit, to Ketchum, Kelly, and Hiles, who now refuse to convey to the company, or to admit its right to the lands, this suit is brought to have a declaration of the trust made by the court, and a decree ordering conveyances by the defendants of the land to the corporation. It is further alleged that the mortgage in process of foreclosure in the court under which Case is acting as receiver covered all the lands of the corporation, and would cover these lands, if the title of the corporation in them was established. The defendants Kelly, Ketchum, and Hiles filed answers, in which they denied all fraud or deception, denied that they held the lands in trust for the railroad company, and denied the right of plaintiff to any relief. A decree, for want of an answer, was taken pro confesso against the Arcadia Mineral Spring Company. Replications were filed to the answers. The case was put at issue as regards the three principal defendants, and an immense mass of testimony, documentary and otherwise, was taken.
The circuit court, on the hearing, was of opinion that the conveyances made by various persons to Kelly and Ketchum and Hiles of the lands described in the bill were made by the grantors, and received by the defendants, as contributions to the railroad company, to aid in the construction of its road; and that, if the railroad company had authority by law to receive such grants, and to hold such real estate, it would be entitled to the relief sought in the bill in this case. But being also of opinion that, by the laws of Wisconsin, and under its charter, it could only receive and hold lands for the defined purposes of the road, it held that only such lands as were necessary and proper for the immediate use of the road could be recovered in this suit. 13 Amer. & Eng. R. Cas. 70. It therefore e tered the following interlocutory decree: The master made his report, accompanied by the testimony to which exceptions were taken, both by Case, the receiver, and by the defendants Hiles and Kelly; which exceptions were overruled by the court, and a final decree entered. From this the present appeal is taken.
That decree, after specifying certain pieces of land which the court considered as necessary and proper to the road, for its use, in the way of track, right of way, depots, and other similar, proper, and necessary uses, ordered the conveyance of these...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Fountain v. Lewiston Nat. Bank
... ... possession was taken did not amount to the transfer of title ... but was in law only a mortgage ... 4. In ... such case, even though it should be conceded that the entry ... was not made under an absolute title, it is clear that it was ... done under color of title ... same time upon said date between the same parties for the ... same consideration and upon the same land, they constitute a ... mortgage. ( Kelly v. Leachman, 3 Idaho 392, 29 P ... 849; Pritchard v. Butler, 4 Idaho 518, 43 P. 73; ... Wilson v. Thompson, 4 Idaho 678, 43 P. 557.) The ... ...
-
Rachels v. Stecher Cooperage Works
...phrase "such land as the purposes of the corporation shall require" signifies such land as will give it the room it requires. 3 Zab. 514; 133 U.S. 21; S.W. 485; 1 Dutch. 316; 43 N.Y. 137; 33 So. 84; 45 Mo. 212; 9 Rich. L. 236. Appellee acquired no title to the land. 60 Ark. 120; 35 S.W. 898......
-
Rockhill Tennis Club of Kansas City v. Volker
...it. The reason is that the enforcement of such a contract would be against public policy, and in direct violation of law. [Citing Case v. Kelly, 133 U.S. 28.] . . . we have said disposes of the objection that the defendant cannot avail himself of the plea of ultra vires. When the action is ......
-
The Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Smith
... ... 49, by said commissioners set apart to him or said Wade, in ... trust for plaintiff; and that in case plaintiff by April 13, ... 1891, paid into the hands of the clerk for defendant's ... use $ 100, with interest from October 25, 1880, in all $ 164, ... fixed by the statute of limitations. In such cases mere lapse ... of time short of the statutory period does not operate to ... bar. Kelly v. Hurt, 61 Mo. 464; Kelly v ... Hurt, 74 Mo. 561; Spurlock v. Sproule, 72 Mo ... 504; Gordon v. Lewis, 88 Mo. 381; Kline v ... Vogel, ... ...