Case v. Moorer
Citation | 273 Ala. 494,142 So.2d 913 |
Decision Date | 21 June 1962 |
Docket Number | 1 Div. 887 |
Parties | A. B. CASE v. M. L. MOORER et al. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Wilkins, Stephenson & Byrd, Pillans, Reams, Tappan, Wood & Roberts and Austill & Austill, Mobile, for appellant.
Caffey, Gallalee & Caffey, Mobile, for appellees Moorer.
McCorvey, Turner, Johnstone, Adams & May, Mobile, for appellee Magnolia Petroleum Co.
Appeal from a decree of the circuit court of Mobile County, in equity, sustaining the demurrer of each of the appellees to appellant's bill of complaint, as last amended, seeking a declaratory judgment.
Appellant insists that the decree should be reversed in view of the rule that, where a bill seeking a declaratory judgment shows a bona fide justiciable controversy which should be settled, a demurrer thereto should be overruled and a declaration of rights made and entered only after answer and on such evidence as the parties may deem proper on submission for final decree. Appellees, on the other hand, say the bill presents only a question of law which the court could and should determine on demurrer, relying principally on Werneth v. Hanly, 262 Ala. 219, 78 So.2d 299.
In later cases, the court has adhered to the policy of not determining the merits of a controversy involved in a declaratory judgment proceeding when presented by demurrer, even though a question of law only is presented, unless the parties manifest a desire that it be done. Orkin Exterminating Company of North Alabama v. Krawcheck, 271 Ala. 305, 310-311, 123 So.2d 149; Hane v. Bell, 270 Ala. 82, 87, 116 So.2d 590; Shew v. City of Gadsden, 265 Ala. 253, 254, 90 So.2d 768; Adams Supply Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 265 Ala. 178, 182-183, 90 So.2d 284, 287. As said in the last cited case:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Coxe v. Wilson
...by demurrer, even though a question of law only is presented, unless the parties manifest a desire that it be done. Case v. Moorer, 273 Ala. 494, 142 So.2d 913; Fillmore v. Yarbrough, 246 Ala. 375, 20 So.2d 792; McCall v. Nettles, 251 Ala. 349, 37 So.2d 635. Of course in the case at bar no ......