Cases the Butchers Benevolent Association of New Orleans v. the Crescent Citylanding and Company Paul Esteben Ruch Rouede Maylie Firmberg Beaubay, William Fagan Broderick Seibel Lannes Gitzinger Aycock Verges, Thedealers and Butchers Association of New Orleans, and Charles Cavaroc v. the State of Louisiana Belden, the Butchers Benevolent Association of New Orleans v. the Crescent Citylanding and Company

Decision Date01 December 1872
Docket NumberATTORNEY-GENERAL,LIVE-STOCK,SLAUGHTER-HOUSE
CitationCases the Butchers Benevolent Association of New Orleans v. the Crescent Citylanding and Company Paul Esteben Ruch Rouede Maylie Firmberg Beaubay, William Fagan Broderick Seibel Lannes Gitzinger Aycock Verges, Thedealers and Butchers Association of New Orleans, and Charles Cavaroc v. the State of Louisiana Belden, the Butchers Benevolent Association of New Orleans v. the Crescent Citylanding and Company, 83 U.S. 36, 21 L.Ed. 394, 16 Wall. 36 (1872)
PartiesCASES. THE BUTCHERS' BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF NEW ORLEANS v. THE CRESCENT CITYLANDING AND COMPANY. PAUL ESTEBEN, L. RUCH, J. P. ROUEDE, W. MAYLIE, S. FIRMBERG, B. BEAUBAY, WILLIAM FAGAN, J. D. BRODERICK, N. SEIBEL, M. LANNES, J. GITZINGER, J. P. AYCOCK, D. VERGES, THEDEALERS' AND BUTCHERS' ASSOCIATION OF NEW ORLEANS, AND CHARLES CAVAROC v. THE STATE OF LOUISIANA, ex rel. S. BELDEN, THE BUTCHERS' BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF NEW ORLEANS v. THE CRESCENT CITYLANDING AND COMPANY
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

'SECTION 1. Be it enacted, &c., That from and after the first day of June, A.D. 1869, it shall not be lawful to land, keep, or slaughter any cattle, beeves, calves, sheep, swine, or other animals, or to have, keep, or establish any stock-landing, yards, pens, slaughter-houses, or abattoirs at any point or place within the city of New Orleans, or the parishes of Orleans, Jefferson, and St. Bernard, or at any point or place on the east bank of the Mississippi River within the corporate limits of the city of New Orleans, or at any point on the west bank of the Mississippi River, above the present depot of the New Orleans, Opelousas, and Great Western Railroad Company, except that the 'Crescent City Stock Landing and Slaughter-House Company' may establish themselves at any point or place as hereinafter provided. Any person or persons, or corporation or company carrying on any business or doing any act in contravention of this act, or landing, slaughtering or keeping any animal or animals in violation of this act, shall be liable to a fine of $250, for each and every violation, the same to be recoverable, with costs of suit, before any court of competent jurisdiction.'

The second section of the act created one Sanger and sixteen other persons named, a corporation, with the usual privileges of a corporation, and including power to appoint officers, and fix their compensation and term of office, and to fix the amount of the capital stock of the corporation and the number of shares thereof.

The act then went on:

'SECTION 3. Be it further enacted, &c., That said company or corporation is hereby authorized to establish and erect at its own expense, at any point or place on the east bank of the Mississippi River within the parish of St. Bernard, or in the corporate limits of the city of New Orleans, below the United States Barracks, or at any point or place on the west bank of the Mississippi River below the present depot of the New Orleans, Opelousas, and Great Western Railroad Company, wharves, stables, sheds, yards, and buildings necessary to land, stable, shelter, protect, and preserve all kinds of horses, mules, cattle, and other animals; and from and after the time such buildings, yards, &c., are ready and complete for business, and notice thereof is given in the official journal of the State, the said Crescent City Live-Stock Landing and Slaughter-House Company shall have the sole and exclusive privilege of conducting and carrying on the live-stock landing and slaughter-house business within the limits and privileges granted by the provisions of this act; and cattle and other animals destined for sale or slaughter in the city of New Orleans, or its environs, shall be landed at the live-stock landings and yards of said company, and shall be yarded, sheltered, and protected, if necessary, by said company or corporation; and said company or corporation shall be entitled to have and receive for each steamship landing at the wharves of the said company or corporation, $10; for each steamboat or other water craft, $5; and for each horse, mule, bull, ox, or cow landed at their wharves, for each and every day kept, 10 cents; for each and every hog, calf, sheep, or goat, for each and every day kept, 5 cents, all without including the feed; and said company or corporation shall be entitled to keep and detain each and all of said animals until said charges are fully paid. But if the charges of landing, keeping, and feeding any of the aforesaid animals shall not be paid by the owners thereof after fifteen days of their being landed and placed in the custody of the said company or corporation, then the said company or corporation, in order to reimburse themselves for charges and expenses incurred, shall have power, by resorting to judicial proceedings, to advertise said animals for sale by auction, in any two newspapers published in the city of New Orleans, for five days; and after the expiration of said five days, the said company or corporation may proceed to sell by auction, as advertised, the said animals, and the proceeds of such sales shall be taken by the said company or corporation, and applied to the payment of the charges and expenses aforesaid, and other additional costs; and the balance, if any, remaining from such sales, shall be held to the credit of and paid to the order or receipt of the owner of said animals. Any person or persons, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions of this act, or interfering with the privileges herein granted, or landing, yarding, or keeping any animals in violation of the provisions of this act, or to the injury of said company or corporation, shall be liable to a fine or penalty of $250, to be recovered with costs of suit before any court of competent jurisdiction.

'The company shall, before the first of June, 1869, build and complete A GRAND SLAUGHTER-HOUSE of sufficient capacity to accommodate all butchers, and in which to slaughter 500 animals per day; also a sufficient number of sheds and stables shall be erected before the date aforementioned, to accommodate all the stock received at this port, all of which to be accomplished before the date fixed for the removal of the stock landing, as provided in the first section of this act, under penalty of a forfeiture of their charter.

'SECTION 4. Be it further enacted, &c., That the said company or corporation is hereby authorized to erect, at its own expense, one or more landing-places for live stock, as aforesaid, at any points or places consistent with the provisions of this act, and to have and enjoy from the completion thereof, and after the first day of June, A.D. 1869, the exclusive privilege of having landed at their wharves or landing-places all animals intended for sale or slaughter in the parishes of Orleans and Jefferson; and are hereby also authorized (in connection) to erect at its own expense one or more slaughter-houses, at any points or places consistent with the provisions of this act, and to have and enjoy, from the completion thereof, and after the first day of June, A.D. 1869, the exclusive privilege of having slaughtered therein all animals, the meat of which is destined for sale in the parishes of Orleans and Jefferson.

'SECTION 5. Be it further enacted, &c., That whenever said slaughter-houses and accessory buildings shall be completed and thrown open for the use of the public, said company or corporation shall immediately give public notice for thirty days, in the official journal of the State, and within said thirty days' notice, and within, from and after the first day of June, A.D. 1869, all other stock landings and slaughter-houses within the parishes of Orleans, Jefferson, and St. Bernard shall be closed, and it will no longer be lawful to slaughter cattle, hogs, calves, sheep, or goats, the meat of which is determined for sale within the parishes aforesaid, under a penalty of $100, for each and every offence, recoverable, with costs of suit, before any court of competent jurisdiction; that all animals to be slaughtered, the meat whereof is determined for sale in the parishes of Orleans or Jefferson, must be slaughtered in the slaughter-houses erected by the said company or corporation; and upon a refusal of said company or corporation to allow and animal or animals to be slaughtered after the same has been certified by the inspector, as hereinafter provided, to be fit for human food, the said company or corporation shall be subject to a fine in each case of $250, recoverable, with costs of suit, before any court of competent jurisdiction; said fines and penalties to be paid over to the auditor of public accounts, which sum or sums shall be credited to the educational fund.

'SECTION 6. Be it further enacted, &c., That the governor of the State of Louisiana shall appoint a competent person, clothed with police powers, to act as inspector of all stock that is to be slaughtered, and whose duty it will be to examine closely all animals intended to be slaughtered, to ascertain whether they are sound and fit for human food or not; and if sound and fit for human food, to furnish a certificate stating that fact, to the owners of the animals inspected; and without said certificate no animals can be slaughtered for sale in the slaughter-houses of said company or corporation. The owner of said animals so inspected to pay the inspector 10 cents for each and every animal so inspected, one-half of which fee the said inspector shall retain for his services, and the other half of said fee shall be paid...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1243 cases
  • Larson v. Seattle Popular Monorail Auth.
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • March 30, 2006
    ...This is in general a sufficient security against erroneous and oppressive taxation"); Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 36, 115, 21 L.Ed. 394 (1872) (Bradley, J., dissenting) (Referring to the fundamentals of the constitution in the Colonies and its regarding "taxation without repre......
  • Bakke v. Regents of University of California
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • September 16, 1976
    ...to protect the black minority from the discriminatory legal treatment it had previously suffered (see, e.g., Slaughterhouse Cases (1873) 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 36, 81, 21 L.Ed. 394; Bickel, The Original Understanding and the Segregation Decision (1955) 69 Harv.L.Rev. 1, 60), racial classificati......
  • Hiatt v. City of Berkeley
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • September 25, 1978
    ...that the equal protection of laws was framed in universal terms, without reference to color or ethnic origin (Slaughter House Cases (1872) 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 36, 71, 21 L.Ed. 394); that the guarantees of equal protection "are universal in their application, to all persons within the territo......
  • Hiatt v. City of Berkeley
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • January 19, 1979
    ...that the equal protection of laws was framed in universal terms, without reference to color or ethnic origin (Slaughter House Cases (1872) 83 U.S. (16 Wallace) 36, 71, 21 L.Ed. 394); that the guarantees of equal protection "are universal in their application, to all persons within the terri......
  • Get Started for Free
4 firm's commentaries
  • Slamming The Backdoor On Non-Consensual Third-Party Releases
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • May 14, 2025
    ...at 86. 32. Id. at 80. 33. Id. at 82. 34. Id. at 81. 35. Id. at 82-85. 36. See Crandall v. Nevada, 73 U.S. 35, 48 (1867); Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. 36, 79 (1873). 37. See Granfinanciera, S.A. v. Nordberg, 492 U.S. 33, 53 Slamming The Backdoor On Non-Consensual Third-Party Releases The c......
  • Originalism’s Frailties: A Reply to Professor Lamparello
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • June 20, 2023
    ...standard itself remains the same, but its applicability must change as the basic mores of society change”). [9] See, e.g., Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. 36, 81 (1873). [10] Women’s Suffrage in the U.S. by State, https://tag.rutgers.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/suffrage-by-state.pdf (last......
  • Queen Anne’s Revenge, Indeed!: Copyright Conundrums, Sovereign States, and IP Piracy
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • July 23, 2020
    ...rights—“placed under the special care of the Federal government,” and has recognized them for almost 150 years. See Slaughterhouse Cases, 83 U.S. 36, 78 The Court did go on to say that that ruling “need not prevent Congress from passing a valid copyright abrogation law in the future.” Id. a......
  • U.S. Supreme Court Rules in Second Amendment Case; Affirms Right to Self-Defense as Applicable to the States
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • June 28, 2010
    ...were decided in the wake of this Court’s interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Privileges or Immunities Clause in the Slaughter-House Cases, 16 Wall. 36. Held: The judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded. JUSTICE ALITO delivered the opinion of the Court. For background informa......
96 books & journal articles
  • FAIRNESS FOR ALL? THE IMPLICATIONS OF ADOPTING A THIRDGENDER CATEGORY IN ELITE SPORTS.
    • United States
    • November 1, 2023
    ...under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. ..." (emphasis added)). (76.) See The Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. 36, 67-69 (1872). (77.) Noah R. Feldman & Kathleen M. Sullivan, Constitutional Law 645 (20th ed. (78.) Kevin M. Barry, Brian Farrell, Jenn......
  • CONFLICTS OF LAW AND THE ABORTION WAR BETWEEN THE STATES.
    • United States
    • January 1, 2024
    ...component of the right, should not be overlooked. This is because just after the Fourteenth Amendment was enacted, the Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 36 (1872) "sapped the Clause of any meaning." Saenz, 526 U.S. at 527 (Thomas, J., dissenting). Thus, the Clause lay dormant for ne......
  • Felon disenfranchisement: law, history, policy, and politics.
    • United States
    • Fordham Urban Law Journal Vol. 32 No. 5, September 2005
    • September 1, 2005
    ...(1973); see also LOREN MILLER, THE PETITIONERS: THE STORY OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE NEGRO 180-81 (1966). (52.) 83 U.S. 36 (53.) See MILLER, supra note 51, at 104-07. (54.) United States v. Stanley, 109 U.S. 3 (1883). (55.) See MILLER, supra note 51, at 138-39. (56.) ......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • The Path of Constitutional Law Suplemmentary Materials
    • January 1, 2007
    ...Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n, 489 U.S. 602, 109 S.Ct. 1402, 103 L.Ed.2d 639 (1989), 1007 Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 36, 21 L.Ed. 394 (1872), 138, 405, 429, 435-36, 439, 722, 890, 1065, 1072-74, 1076, 1087, 1106, 1161, 1212, 1215, 1237-39, 1248, 1250, 1326, 1328, 1524 Smith......
  • Get Started for Free