Cases the Butchers Benevolent Association of New Orleans v. the Crescent Citylanding and Company Paul Esteben Ruch Rouede Maylie Firmberg Beaubay, William Fagan Broderick Seibel Lannes Gitzinger Aycock Verges, Thedealers and Butchers Association of New Orleans, and Charles Cavaroc v. the State of Louisiana Belden, the Butchers Benevolent Association of New Orleans v. the Crescent Citylanding and Company
| Decision Date | 01 December 1872 |
| Docket Number | ATTORNEY-GENERAL,LIVE-STOCK,SLAUGHTER-HOUSE |
| Citation | Cases the Butchers Benevolent Association of New Orleans v. the Crescent Citylanding and Company Paul Esteben Ruch Rouede Maylie Firmberg Beaubay, William Fagan Broderick Seibel Lannes Gitzinger Aycock Verges, Thedealers and Butchers Association of New Orleans, and Charles Cavaroc v. the State of Louisiana Belden, the Butchers Benevolent Association of New Orleans v. the Crescent Citylanding and Company, 83 U.S. 36, 21 L.Ed. 394, 16 Wall. 36 (1872) |
| Parties | CASES. THE BUTCHERS' BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF NEW ORLEANS v. THE CRESCENT CITYLANDING AND COMPANY. PAUL ESTEBEN, L. RUCH, J. P. ROUEDE, W. MAYLIE, S. FIRMBERG, B. BEAUBAY, WILLIAM FAGAN, J. D. BRODERICK, N. SEIBEL, M. LANNES, J. GITZINGER, J. P. AYCOCK, D. VERGES, THEDEALERS' AND BUTCHERS' ASSOCIATION OF NEW ORLEANS, AND CHARLES CAVAROC v. THE STATE OF LOUISIANA, ex rel. S. BELDEN, THE BUTCHERS' BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF NEW ORLEANS v. THE CRESCENT CITYLANDING AND COMPANY |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
The second section of the act created one Sanger and sixteen other persons named, a corporation, with the usual privileges of a corporation, and including power to appoint officers, and fix their compensation and term of office, and to fix the amount of the capital stock of the corporation and the number of shares thereof.
The act then went on:
'The company shall, before the first of June, 1869, build and complete A GRAND SLAUGHTER-HOUSE of sufficient capacity to accommodate all butchers, and in which to slaughter 500 animals per day; also a sufficient number of sheds and stables shall be erected before the date aforementioned, to accommodate all the stock received at this port, all of which to be accomplished before the date fixed for the removal of the stock landing, as provided in the first section of this act, under penalty of a forfeiture of their charter.
notice, and within, from and after the first day of June, A.D. 1869, all other stock landings and slaughter-houses within the parishes of Orleans, Jefferson, and St. Bernard shall be closed, and it will no longer be lawful to slaughter cattle, hogs, calves, sheep, or goats, the meat of which is determined for sale within the parishes aforesaid, under a penalty of $100, for each and every offence, recoverable, with costs of suit, before any court of competent jurisdiction; that all animals to be slaughtered, the meat whereof is determined for sale in the parishes of Orleans or Jefferson, must be slaughtered in the slaughter-houses erected by the said company or corporation; and upon a refusal of said company or corporation to allow and animal or animals to be slaughtered after the same has been certified by the inspector, as hereinafter provided, to be fit for human food, the said company or corporation shall be subject to a fine in each case of $250, recoverable, with costs of suit, before any court of competent jurisdiction; said fines and penalties to be paid over to the auditor of public accounts, which sum or sums shall be credited to the educational fund.
...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Larson v. Seattle Popular Monorail Auth.
...This is in general a sufficient security against erroneous and oppressive taxation"); Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 36, 115, 21 L.Ed. 394 (1872) (Bradley, J., dissenting) (Referring to the fundamentals of the constitution in the Colonies and its regarding "taxation without repre......
-
Bakke v. Regents of University of California
...to protect the black minority from the discriminatory legal treatment it had previously suffered (see, e.g., Slaughterhouse Cases (1873) 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 36, 81, 21 L.Ed. 394; Bickel, The Original Understanding and the Segregation Decision (1955) 69 Harv.L.Rev. 1, 60), racial classificati......
-
Hiatt v. City of Berkeley
...that the equal protection of laws was framed in universal terms, without reference to color or ethnic origin (Slaughter House Cases (1872) 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 36, 71, 21 L.Ed. 394); that the guarantees of equal protection "are universal in their application, to all persons within the territo......
-
Hiatt v. City of Berkeley
...that the equal protection of laws was framed in universal terms, without reference to color or ethnic origin (Slaughter House Cases (1872) 83 U.S. (16 Wallace) 36, 71, 21 L.Ed. 394); that the guarantees of equal protection "are universal in their application, to all persons within the terri......
-
Slamming The Backdoor On Non-Consensual Third-Party Releases
...at 86. 32. Id. at 80. 33. Id. at 82. 34. Id. at 81. 35. Id. at 82-85. 36. See Crandall v. Nevada, 73 U.S. 35, 48 (1867); Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. 36, 79 (1873). 37. See Granfinanciera, S.A. v. Nordberg, 492 U.S. 33, 53 Slamming The Backdoor On Non-Consensual Third-Party Releases The c......
-
Originalism’s Frailties: A Reply to Professor Lamparello
...standard itself remains the same, but its applicability must change as the basic mores of society change”). [9] See, e.g., Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. 36, 81 (1873). [10] Women’s Suffrage in the U.S. by State, https://tag.rutgers.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/suffrage-by-state.pdf (last......
-
Queen Anne’s Revenge, Indeed!: Copyright Conundrums, Sovereign States, and IP Piracy
...rights—“placed under the special care of the Federal government,” and has recognized them for almost 150 years. See Slaughterhouse Cases, 83 U.S. 36, 78 The Court did go on to say that that ruling “need not prevent Congress from passing a valid copyright abrogation law in the future.” Id. a......
-
U.S. Supreme Court Rules in Second Amendment Case; Affirms Right to Self-Defense as Applicable to the States
...were decided in the wake of this Court’s interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Privileges or Immunities Clause in the Slaughter-House Cases, 16 Wall. 36. Held: The judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded. JUSTICE ALITO delivered the opinion of the Court. For background informa......
-
FAIRNESS FOR ALL? THE IMPLICATIONS OF ADOPTING A THIRDGENDER CATEGORY IN ELITE SPORTS.
...under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. ..." (emphasis added)). (76.) See The Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. 36, 67-69 (1872). (77.) Noah R. Feldman & Kathleen M. Sullivan, Constitutional Law 645 (20th ed. (78.) Kevin M. Barry, Brian Farrell, Jenn......
-
CONFLICTS OF LAW AND THE ABORTION WAR BETWEEN THE STATES.
...component of the right, should not be overlooked. This is because just after the Fourteenth Amendment was enacted, the Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 36 (1872) "sapped the Clause of any meaning." Saenz, 526 U.S. at 527 (Thomas, J., dissenting). Thus, the Clause lay dormant for ne......
-
Felon disenfranchisement: law, history, policy, and politics.
...(1973); see also LOREN MILLER, THE PETITIONERS: THE STORY OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE NEGRO 180-81 (1966). (52.) 83 U.S. 36 (53.) See MILLER, supra note 51, at 104-07. (54.) United States v. Stanley, 109 U.S. 3 (1883). (55.) See MILLER, supra note 51, at 138-39. (56.) ......
-
Table of Cases
...Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n, 489 U.S. 602, 109 S.Ct. 1402, 103 L.Ed.2d 639 (1989), 1007 Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 36, 21 L.Ed. 394 (1872), 138, 405, 429, 435-36, 439, 722, 890, 1065, 1072-74, 1076, 1087, 1106, 1161, 1212, 1215, 1237-39, 1248, 1250, 1326, 1328, 1524 Smith......