Casey v. People
| Decision Date | 09 March 1959 |
| Docket Number | No. 18822,18822 |
| Parties | William R. CASEY, Plaintiff in Error, v. PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Defendant in Error. |
| Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
William R. Casey, pro se.
Duke W. Dunbar, Atty. Gen., Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Atty. Gen., John W. Patterson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.
Casey was defendant in a justice of the peace court in a misdemeanor prosecution for failure to secure a trailer court license. The People there alleged that the operation of his trailer court was contrary to the rules and regulations of the Board of Health of the Tri-County District Health Department and contrary to the statutes of the State of Colorado. The jury verdict was that Casey was guilty as charged. Appeal was taken to the County Court where defendant was again found guilty. Motion for new trial was denied and Casey is here by writ of error.
He alleges several grounds for reversal, only one of which is necessary to determine the matter here. In substance this relates to whether C.R.S. '53, 66-2-7(4), has unlawfully delegated power to adopt rules and regulations to the various local boards of health, while at the same time providing by C.R.S. '53, 66-2-14 that the violation of any such rules and regulations shall be a misdemeanor subject to a fine of $1,000 or one year's imprisonment, or both penalties?
As to this ground the Attorney General, in his brief, has commendably admitted on behalf of the People that With this conclusion we are in agreement and add that we appreciate the candor and fairness of the Attorney General in so readily acknowledging the sound basic principle involved.
Only the legislature may declare an act to be a crime. People v. Lange, supra. That precious power cannot be delegated to others not elected by or responsible to the People. As stated in 16 C.J.S. 580 Constitutional Law § 138:
In Sapero v. State Board, supra, it is stated that though the power to make a law may not be delegated, the power to determine a...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Gallegos
...represents the popular will and is accountable to it. L. Tribe, American Constitutional Law, § 5-17 at 286 (1978). See Casey v. People, 139 Colo. 89, 336 P.2d 308 (1959). The defendant argues that the discretion accorded the prosecutor in deciding whether or not to charge an eligible offend......
-
Davis v. City and County of Denver, s. 18293
...v. People, 37 Colo. 317, 87 P. 791, 8 L.R.A.,N.S., 131; Burcher v. People, 41 Colo. 495, 93 P. 14, 124 Am.St.Rep. 143; Casey v. People, 139 Colo. ----, 336 P.2d 308. Amazing to me is the citation of authorities in the majority opinion. A reading of this material supports my contention and d......
-
Woolverton v. City and County of Denver
...authority to transfer this power to any other person or body.' People v. Lange, 48 Colo. 428, 110 P. 68, 69. In a very recent case, Casey v. People, supra, not involving a home rule city, we perhaps too broadly 'Only the legislature may declare an act to be a crime. People v. Lange, supra. ......
-
State v. Watts
...This exclusive legislative function may not be delegated to any other body or agency without adequate guidelines. Casey v. People, 139 Colo. 89, 336 P.2d 308, 309; Greenwald v. State, 221 Md. 235, 155 A.2d 894, 897, appeal dismissed, 363 U.S. 719, 80 S.Ct. 1596, 4 L.Ed.2d 1521; Lapinski v. ......
-
Using Local Police Powers to Protect the Environment
...in violation of: (I) Any statute of this state; (II) Any regulation enacted pursuant to the authority of a statute of this state." 37. 336 P.2d 308 (Colo. 1959). 38. 761 P.2d 778 (Colo. 1988). 39. CRS § 29-22-108. 40. CRS § 29-22-101(2)(a). A statutory problem exists, however, apparently ex......
-
The Securities Act of 1981: a Reduction in Duplicate Regulation
...v. Tenorio, ___ Colo. ___, 590 P.2d 952 (1979); People v. Harper, 193 Colo. 116, 562 P.2d 1112 (1977); Casey v. People, 139 Colo. 2174 89, 336 P.2d 308 9. C.R.S. 1973, § 11-51-107. 10. C.R.S. 1973, § 11-51-113(2)(o). This definition is identical in all relevant respects to the intrastate of......